Taylor played Her VD role well because Her VD role was basically "goofy girl/ Taylor Swift self-parody"
+1
I don't understand the hate for the VD role. She was playing the role of a silly girl and she played it smartly. That's why the silliness of the character was conveyed to us.
The redtourupdates tumblr posted it, but Kibbles says it may have been misinterpreted a bit. Either way, the dates should be coming swiftly... not necessarily tomorrow.
Swift made her feature film acting debut in the 2010 ensemble comedy Valentine's Day, playing the ditzy Valley girlfriend of a high school jock.The Los Angeles Times felt the performance suggested "serious comedic potential" while the San Francisco Chronicle found her "very funny." Time remarked that Swift portrayed her character "rather charmingly"; The Boston Globe described her as "adorably dorky." Salon asserted that she was "one of the few actors not wasted in "Valentine's Day". Her overgrown-pixie look and odd, widely set eyes lend her a little bit of Marilyn and a little bit of Lucille Ball: She's Taylor-made for comic greatness."
The Lord was great in that movie, it's not Her fault that it sucks
I don't understand the hate for the VD role. She was playing the role of a silly girl and she played it smartly. That's why the silliness of the character was conveyed to us.
I agree that she played her role well and according to how it was written but it does no good to argue with fans or non-fans who point to VD and say she can't act. They can't seem to grasp that thats what the role called for. So anymore I just say the material is what made the role, because it did.
A spy movie? Really? She did say she would only do a movie she feels strong about and can not put it down. Girl sure loves her crime shows. So its along the lines...
Its just not what i expected at all. If its even true.
The fact that I paid money to see that movie , I remember that one of my thoughts was "that girl looks familiar", 1 year ago I realised that was Taylor.