hahaha oh really? Because my sister went to this tour in TORONTO and she did not perform in the amphitheatre, and instead performed in an ARENA called ACC (Air Canada Centre). But ok.
It's so sad how that Teenage Dream Katy tour grossed SO LOW, considering how much her stans like to brag about the 'success' of the era.
Katy was doing arenas only with 5m albums overall sold and 0 iconic performance. Britney had already sold 50m albums and had 4+ iconic performances. A bit tragic
hahaha oh really? Because my sister went to this tour in TORONTO and she did not perform in the amphitheatre, and instead performed in an ARENA called ACC (Air Canada Centre). But ok.
The cancelled leg was the second leg. She had already performed in all those cities.
But everything about a Katy Perry era is underwhelming and irrelevant other than her single sales.
It must be boring being a Katy stan.
Right?
She's ugly, talentless, music sucks, can't sing, writing sucks, stuck up, can't perform, uninteresting, BORING, the list goes on... Only thing that's nice about her is her t its, and even those aren't so great.
hahaha oh really? Because my sister went to this tour in TORONTO and she did not perform in the amphitheatre, and instead performed in an ARENA called ACC (Air Canada Centre). But ok.
Stripped was a bigger era than both Britney and In The Zone. Not combined, obviously, but if you compare individually. The reason Britney was still considered top female was because she basically sold 20 million between ITZ/Britney in such a short span, was still getting massive hits (esp w/ ITZ) and of course the public fascination. Legend did 10-11 million w/ Stripped but that era was stretched out for a while.
Britney and In The Zone both, individually, demolish B2B, so not sure where that came from.
B2B > Blackout due to album sales and touring, but Gimme More and Piece of Me have both held up better than the B2B singles. By a lot. Just look at the digital sales.
And obviously, both Legend X and Britney >>>> Gaga & Katy. The former two were an actual rivalry that people cared about.
She's ugly, talentless, music sucks, can't sing, writing sucks, stuck up, can't perform, uninteresting, BORING, the list goes on... Only thing that's nice about her is her t its, and even those aren't so great.
!!! Even her **** can't save her damn marriage. She's so useless her husband had to imagine anyone but her to be intimate with her.
Luckily though, she'll always have Dr. Luke's dick to fall back on.
Stripped was a bigger era than both Britney and In The Zone. Not combined, obviously, but if you compare individually. The reason Britney was still considered top female was because she basically sold 20 million between ITZ/Britney in such a short span, was still getting massive hits (esp w/ ITZ) and of course the public fascination. Legend did 10-11 million w/ Stripped but that era was stretched out for a while.
Britney and In The Zone both, individually, demolish B2B, so not sure where that came from.
B2B > Blackout due to album sales and touring, but Gimme More and Piece of Me have both held up better than the B2B singles. By a lot. Just look at the digital sales.
And obviously, both Legend X and Britney >>>> Gaga & Katy. The former two were an actual rivalry that people cared about.
Stripped wasn't bigger than Britney. The Britney album sold 12m albums WW and it didn't have a massive hit, and she was blacklisted by radio in the US. ITZ era managed to sell 10m WW with only 3 singles (that hit #1 WW mind you). If the era had been longer, she could've sold 1.5m-2m more albums with ITZ.
Katy Perry is the purrrfect example of a useless woman. Betsy Ross, Amelia Earhart, and Madonnas respected legacy did not die for people like her to exist.
Dang, Britney her power.
She was selling out EVERYWHERE. Ticket prices were MUCH lower then.