|
Poll: So is Justin T officially the Prince of Pop?
View Poll Results: ?
|
Yes / Always has been.
|
  
|
80 |
65.57% |
Nope / _____ is.
|
  
|
42 |
34.43% |
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 1,510
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BobBertran1992
Yes, you could say I'm pressed, I don't think he's talented at all, he's the Lady Gaga of the male pop music when it comes to, you know, recognize his influences. Also I don't like either his voice or how people praise him for releasing songs that have already been made on the 80s. Let me say though that he's pretty, I'll give that to him, I'd do him! 
|
Lady Gaga is a talented artist too. So, I don't see how that's a bad thing 
Bruno writes and produces, multi-instrumentalist, great vocalist and great performer.
You said JT is talented. But Bruno not?
Bruno is far better multi-instrumentalists and vocalist than JT.
JT is a better dancer, I give him that.
Producer and songwriter were his main job for years before he got his breakthrough as a solo artist.
His music is inspired by old school music, so I think it's not a surprise if his songs sound derivative 
Robin Thicke also did that with BL.
Amy W, Mayer H, The Black Keys, basically every artist who makes old school music will sound derivative.
Just like JT who is heavily inspired by MJ. He's not original too if we wanna see this from your point of view.
So why he's talented and Bruno not?
Music is art and nothing original about it. New generation will always be inspired by old generation.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/5/2011
Posts: 9,174
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Vin
Even after that very brief surge, "Take Back The Night," his first single from a new album,
still didn't crack the top ten on iTunes, Hazuki. Doesn't sound very "Prince of Pop" to me.
...Hazuki has a nice, sakura blossom ring to it, too.
...Vin
|
I'm now following you on twitter. 
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/16/2008
Posts: 59,380
|
He is, there's no so much competition in that area and tbh only JT & Bruno are the ones deserving that award, they have the sale, acclaim and global appeal to be it.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/14/2011
Posts: 3,762
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Firework
He's so boring tbh, same outfits, same dire dance moves and just recycles old songs to make hits

|
This
20/20 Experience Still isn't doing it for me.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 32,106
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Merelyn
Lady Gaga is a talented artist too. So, I don't see how that's a bad thing 
Bruno writes and produces, multi-instrumentalist, great vocalist and great performer.
You said JT is talented. But Bruno not?
Bruno is far better multi-instrumentalists and vocalist than JT.
JT is a better dancer, I give him that.
Producer and songwriter were his main job for years before he got his breakthrough as a solo artist.
His music is inspired by old school music, so I think it's not a surprise if his songs sound derivative 
Robin Thicke also did that with BL.
Amy W, Mayer H, The Black Keys, basically every artist who makes old school music will sound derivative.
Just like JT who is heavily inspired by MJ. He's not original too if we wanna see this from your point of view.
So why he's talented and Bruno not?
Music is art and nothing original about it. New generation will always be inspired by old generation.
|
Bruno could play a thousand instruments at the same time and still he'd be missing so many things, playing many instruments doesn't make you less or more talented, it is the quality of what you do with those instruments that makes you good, and JT has talent enough to write songs, star in movies, produce shows, sing and dance live, and look, I'm not even a big JT fan, but also he's got that STARDOM that has made his career longer and more relevant than anyone else right now ( not only Bruno)
The thing is, and going back to topic, there are so many male performers and artists out there who are better than JT, but they aren't as pleasing as Justin to the GP, Robbie Williams or George Michael come to mind for example
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/7/2010
Posts: 4,986
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/13/2011
Posts: 9,289
|
LOL... for sure and for many many years.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 122
|
Sure, who else would it be?
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/9/2012
Posts: 16,749
|
I wonder if Usher ever feels slighted that JT is considered MJs successor. Anyways, yes JT is the Prince of Pop and always has been.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/6/2012
Posts: 18,398
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 1,510
|
Quote:
Originally posted by BobBertran1992
Bruno could play a thousand instruments at the same time and still he'd be missing so many things, playing many instruments doesn't make you less or more talented, it is the quality of what you do with those instruments that makes you good, and JT has talent enough to write songs, star in movies, produce shows, sing and dance live, and look, I'm not even a big JT fan, but also he's got that STARDOM that has made his career longer and more relevant than anyone else right now ( not only Bruno)
The thing is, and going back to topic, there are so many male performers and artists out there who are better than JT, but they aren't as pleasing as Justin to the GP, Robbie Williams or George Michael come to mind for example
|
Just like I said before, you think he's not talented because you don't like his music and for me that's such a weird point of view.
You think he can't do anything good with those instruments he played because he can't make music that pleases you.
But many people think he makes good music. GP and critics.
So, basically you think every artist that can't make music you enjoy is not talented?
Musicians make music not to please people. Music is the way to express their feeling and artistry.
JT has interest to act and being producer for TV show, doesn't mean he's more talented.
JT's acting skill is nothing to brag about.
How many musicians who can't act and produce a show?
They just wanna focus to make music and that's what Bruno do.
On topic, this kind of title is given and/or validated by GP. You can call anyone king, prince, or whatever, but if GP disagree, it still useless.
Elvis' title as king of rock n' roll and MJ's title as king of pop got support from GP. That's why that title stick to them even after they died.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/19/2013
Posts: 3,815
|
Nah. Either Usher or.Bruno are better.suited for that title. Usher is Flopping like.the dickens now but his peak was higher and he influenced more people. He had a triple punch with My.Way, 8701 and Confessions which.sold a million.in a week. Plus he's a better singer and.dancer. This JT circle jerk is just hype and propaganda. I mean 20/20 doesn't have a #1 single yet. Even Bruno did that with his last era.
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/15/2013
Posts: 32,106
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Merelyn
Just like I said before, you think he's not talented because you don't like his music and for me that's such a weird point of view.
You think he can't do anything good with those instruments he played because he can't make music that pleases you.
But many people think he makes good music. GP and critics.
So, basically you think every artist that can't make music you enjoy is not talented?
Musicians make music not to please people. Music is the way to express their feeling and artistry.
JT has interest to act and being producer for TV show, doesn't mean he's more talented.
JT's acting skill is nothing to brag about.
How many musicians who can't act and produce a show?
They just wanna focus to make music and that's what Bruno do.
On topic, this kind of title is given and/or validated by GP. You can call anyone king, prince, or whatever, but if GP disagree, it still useless.
Elvis' title as king of rock n' roll and MJ's title as king of pop got support from GP. That's why that title stick to them even after they died.
|
Having the GP doesn't mean anythin, I mean, there are/have been many acts who have been succesful over the years but never really ended up being relevant, and let's go further, even though they had success, they never left a footprint on history, like MJ has for his talent and thanks of course to millions of people who are/were fans. Michael's work was flawless and he never failed to bring something of his own into a work that was inspired by his idols, and that's where Bruno fails.
By the way, yeah, I don't like his music and, as haughty it might sound, if I don't like his music or his perfomances I don't think he's talented
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/6/2011
Posts: 3,787
|
been that way for a long time . . . the other person in the OP however, i doubt lives up to the title.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/16/2009
Posts: 14,616
|
He is def the prince of Pop 
|
|
|
|
|