ATRL HQ: Archived: ATRL HQ (2013-2014) - Page 369

sGabe4

why did I get a WP for this?

http://atrl.net/?p=16170660

literally 99% of the thread is shade towards Katy and I just stated an objective opinion

MrPeanut

Quote:

Originally posted by Kworb

Three more permanent points.

Not really. It's a stan base attack. I wouldn't warn "Rihtard" as nickname for Rihanna, for example.

So artists are still fair game?

Rainsford

My report sucess rate will be amazing this month

Kworb

Quote:

Originally posted by MrPeanut

So artists are still fair game?

That's what the thread is for.

MrPeanut

Quote:

Originally posted by Kworb

That's what the thread is for.

I just wasn't sure cuz earlier you guys were discussing what would warrant an "offensive" warning now and it seemed like the rules have been tightened.

HausOfGerard

Who got banned last night?

SHICD

OMG Kworb, why have you guys done this to SYG? There's no point anymore. The whole point of the thread was to get the shade out and now ATRL mods are just ruining it all. I don't mean any offense, but you guys should really rethink this. Especially when a lot of people getting banned helped pay for this site and now it's not even fun anymore because people are being hypocrites and whining about it. When you guys closed SYG during the VMAs that was not funny, are you guys trying to get people banned? Just let the site run itself. IT WAS FINE FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE.

Kworb

Quote:

Originally posted by SHICD

OMG Kworb, why have you guys done this to SYG? There's no point anymore. The whole point of the thread was to get the shade out and now ATRL mods are just ruining it all. I don't mean any offense, but you guys should really rethink this. Especially when a lot of people getting banned helped pay for this site and now it's not even fun anymore because people are being hypocrites and whining about it. When you guys closed SYG during the VMAs that was not funny, are you guys trying to get people banned? Just let the site run itself. IT WAS FINE FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE.

It's still fine now. Almost at page 100. People seem to enjoy it.

rihannafan

Stop complaining about SYG

It's fine. You don't need to call out stanbases.

Sloth

Quote:

Originally posted by SHICD

OMG Kworb, why have you guys done this to SYG? There's no point anymore. The whole point of the thread was to get the shade out and now ATRL mods are just ruining it all. I don't mean any offense, but you guys should really rethink this. Especially when a lot of people getting banned helped pay for this site and now it's not even fun anymore because people are being hypocrites and whining about it. When you guys closed SYG during the VMAs that was not funny, are you guys trying to get people banned? Just let the site run itself. IT WAS FINE FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE.

Keep complaining about it and they'll close it down for good this time

SHICD

Quote:

Originally posted by Sloth

Keep complaining about it and they'll close it down for good this time

Wont make a difference anyways.

Pelvic Thrust

Quote:

Originally posted by Kworb

Not really. Be offensive at your own risk. The mod who handles the report will decide whether it deserves a point.

lmfao what a joke. atrl has really gone downhill

SHICD

Quote:

Originally posted by Pelvic Thrust

lmfao what a joke. atrl has really gone downhill

Sooo it's subjective? K.

Kworb

Quote:

Originally posted by Pelvic Thrust

lmfao what a joke. atrl has really gone downhill

It's the same as every other insensitive/offensive warning on ATRL.

C/H/A/N/E/L

Will the Stand Your Ground blog in Blogs remain rule-free (Other than illegal download links, inappropriate-content-not-in-warning-tags, and posting other members' photos)?

Gui Blackout

This forum requires that you wait 600 seconds between searches.

Fatality

So I got a point for this http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.ph...3#post16174183 I can see how this is viewed as flamebait but it was a honest question, and I even praised her a post later. please reverse but if you don't whatever

C/H/A/N/E/L

Quote:

Originally posted by Kworb

There have always been situations where one mod would warn something and another wouldn't. It'll always be subjective like that no matter how much detail you put into the rules.

But that's not good. The mods should have consistency in their warning & handling. That way, everything is fair. You can't have it be so subjective depending on which mod gets you; that leads to it being unfair, and can lead to bigger messes, such as one member getting a point for something and another member not; someone would definitely complain about something like this.
I mean, the mods should stick together & be consistent.

Kworb

Quote:

Originally posted by X/O/X/O

But that's not good. The mods should have consistency in their warning & handling. That way, everything is fair. You can't have it be so subjective depending on which mod gets you; that leads to it being unfair, and can lead to bigger messes, such as one member getting a point for something and another member not; someone would definitely complain about something like this.
I mean, the mods should stick together & be consistent.

Every warning has always been subjective. It can't be anything but subjective. When people feel like they don't deserve a WP then they bring it up here or send a help request and they get a second opinion. It's worked fine for ages, why wouldn't it for SYG?

Kitt

What happened to my disruptive/pointless gif?