NNnn;;;
Fair enough, but this isn't the first time Syrians ask for help, and this isn't the first time Syria has used chemical weapons. Why now?

Believe it or not, it has everything to do with various wars and interventions that the USA has been a part of. You cannot just disregard history and say it has nothing to do with current events, because everything is interconnected. You're suppose to study things that happened in the past in order to better oneself and learn the past. I don't care what Obama has addressed or what he hasn't, the Iraq war was Bush's work, not Obama's. However, any sane person would see similarities within the States intervention within various countries.

Most do not want the intervention of the United States, because no good will ever come out of that. What bias? Have you been there lately? Have you spoken to the people of syria there?

I never said I disagree with intervention or the helping of the innocent citizens, I'm saying that the way the American gov't goes about it is sneaky and wrong, because the only reason the US ever involves itself in an attack is when it economically benefits them, the "oppression" and actual well being of Syrians has nothing to do with why these missiles could possibly be launched.

I'm mixed on this. On one hand something needs to be done about the situation in Syria but again we really shouldn't be launching missiles but then again its not like the leader is listening to us and he's still killing his people.

It's hilarious people always whine about America intervening but you never see the Netherlands or someplace stepping in as people literally get murdered in the streets.

Say what you want about the U.S, but when s**t hits the fan, people know who to turn to.

The us would never use Nuclear weapons on something like this.