lol at getting his ass whooped.

Trayvon was smashing sis's skull into the cement. Bit of a difference, no?

No one said there was anything wrong with countering against it. It's personal attacks that people use to "get their point across" - calling people self-hating wannabes, like.. sad to see.

And what? I'm not any throne. Try again

So because he smokes weed and got in trouble at school for it, he's automatically some sort of criminal/dangerous black male stereotype who deserves scrutiny and suspicion from racist and armed men?

Are you really surprised?

I already know who the ignorant culprits are from past threads that went beyond the realms of mainstream pop!

!

But watch me getting banned for not sharing the same opinion.

I just don't understand how anyone can defend how a grown man can follow an unarmed teenage boy who is doing nothing wrong, confront him, shoot him, claim self defense, and be acquitted on all charges. George also has 3 sealed prior assault charges so this behavior is nothing new for him. Just a mess.

I think everyone agrees it's truly tragic that Trayvon died. It should never have came to that. Lets leave it at that.

Can you tell me where you heard this? Was this during the trial or from an outside source? This is the first time I've heard this, that's why I'm asking.

Yes, because I was so clearly "attacking them". Because I was being "ignorant".

Please stop being so high and mighty, thanks.

While I don't think that woman should have been convicted of anything, this is separate from this case because:

She was using a "Stand Your Ground" defense. While that law has been brought up a lot in the Zimmerman trial, the defense was NOT using it as a defense, they were going for a regular self-defense case. When a defendant is using a Stand Your Ground defense, the law specifically says that they have the burden of proof to show to show they met the Stand Your Ground guidelines.

So the difference in these trials was the burden of proof. Prosecutors had the burden of proof in the Zimmerman trial and the defendant in the other case, because she was using a Stand Your Ground defense, had the burden of proof.

You and me are here I don't know what that tidbit of info was supposed to provide?? I agree with some font who stated some should just stick to music and sex (even though many are not even educated on that much themselves)

Keep criminalizing the victim. Do you guys not see the oxymoron in that?
A dead man can't tell no tales. Trayvon did not pull the trigger on himself. Zimmerman is still with a pulse. Trayvon isn't. Some of you all are talking about who read up on the case when you all should have done your HW because Trayvon was not the first black kid George has profiled & harassed. He had an irrational fear & apprehension of black people and he remedied it by exerting that same type of fear & apprehension on black youth.

I ain't never seen someone get their skull bashed into the ground and show up at the police station 5 minutes later saying they are ok with no permanent bruises or bandages on.

What kind of Wolverine teas? Hope he can dodge them bullets like he dodged this conviction.

Did you read the previous post? The guy before LITERALLY SAID THAT HE HAD A GOOD ACADEMIC RECORD. No one's saying that. Stop jumping to conclusions. Just stating facts here.

Adam Lanza was the Sandy Hook elementary school shooter btw, doesn't say that in the picture.

I didn't say that. I was correcting the user who said he had a good academic record. When he clearly didn't.

I'm not sure what "racism" you're referring to here, unless you're referring to a nasty comment on the internet. If that's the case, boo freaking hoo.

of course the same ignorant ppl are in here are going back and forth cosigning each other's ignorance and stupidity

Some of y'all need to take y'all asses straight to bed.

This boy was wrongfully murdered. His academic performance has nothing to do with justifying the fact that he was MURDERED. Have some ****ing respect. Goddamn.