Well, since day 1, Zimmerman has been portrayed as the big bad white guy killing an innocent black teenager. The media bias was so obvious from calling Zimmerman (technically Hispanic) a white man and using children's photos of Martin. All we have to rely on is witness accounts and evidence of the altercation and then jury will decide. Zimmerman did shoot him, but if it's in case of self-defense, he'll be found innocent.
Trayvon WAS an innocent black teenager though. So i guess reality does have a bias huh? Spoken like a republican. Plus wasn't Zimmerman the one who followed him in spite of the police's warning not to proceed and the one who instigated the fight? I just don't understand how its self-defense in this case when Trayvon was unarmed and not the one who started the fight.
Trayvon WAS an innocent black teenager though. So i guess reality does have a bias huh? Spoken like a republican. Plus wasn't Zimmerman the one who followed him in spite of the police's warning not to proceed and the one who instigated the fight? I just don't understand how its self-defense in this case when Trayvon was unarmed and not the one who started the fight.
Well, since day 1, Zimmerman has been portrayed as the big bad white guy killing an innocent black teenager. The media bias was so obvious from calling Zimmerman (technically Hispanic) a white man and using children's photos of Martin. All we have to rely on is witness accounts and evidence of the altercation and then the jury will decide. Zimmerman did shoot him, but if it's in the case of self-defense, he'll be found innocent.
Have you even listened to the Witness accounts or?
Trayvon WAS an innocent black teenager though. So i guess reality does have a bias huh? Spoken like a republican. Plus wasn't Zimmerman the one who followed him in spite of the police's warning not to proceed and the one who instigated the fight? I just don't understand how its self-defense in this case when Trayvon was unarmed and not the one who started the fight.
http://www.cnn.com/2012/05/18/justic...ooting-details
No details on who actually started the physical altercation. It's inconclusive unless you can find an article that for sure says Z started the physical altercation. Last time I checked, an argument isn't illegal. The court needs to decide who threw the first hit. Only GZ at this point knows who started what. Like I said, the jury will decide now based on evidence from the altercation if he's guilty or not. No need to call me a "republican." I'm just not fanatically calling "guilty."
Zimmerman started it by following him he was told not to he did it anyway.
Even if he did kill him in "self defense" it was cause Trayvon was being followed by some stranger.
