Now see stuff like this is soooooooooo scary to me. Especially considering something like over half (?) the bridges in the US are needing to be upgraded / repaired.
If you think that the military and defense budget and expenditure would be significantly less under any other president then you are wrong. This has little to nothing to do with who is in the oval office. Don't forget that two of the most recent infrastructure failures were under Bush (New Orleans levees, I-35 Bridge) if you want to play that card. Besides—and i'm not 100% positive about this next point but wouldn't the respective governing bodies of individual states have a greater responsibility for infrastructure maintenance?
I'm not sure why i'm taking you seriously with that AVI, anyway.
Especially considering something like over half (?) the bridges in the US are needing to be upgraded / repaired.
