WMST G8001 Feminist Pedagogy is a one-credit directed reading course. All Feminist Pedagogy talks are open to the public.
On Thursday, March 14th, Tavia Nyong'o, Associate Professor of Performance Studies at NYU, will speak on: Little Monsters: Fabulating a Queer Bestiary.
"Wildness" has emerged as a post-ecological motif among critics interested in pushing queer and critical race studies past the impasse of the death-bound subject. But where exactly is this wild to which we imagine a return located? This talk mounts an imaginative itinerary through the haunts and havens of the fabulous beasts and little monsters of today. It speculates that a new entelechy of the queer is increasingly subsuming the epistemology of the closet, with its emphasis of power-knowledge. Queerness is mutating and developing new immunities to disclosure and new vulnerabilities as raw life. Popular music increasingly moves along the grooves of this fugitive queer vitalism.
And other stanbases are saying we are irrelevant for not having a Wiki-page
First our fave has university courses dedicated to her and now there are university lectures on her stanbase and the other stanbases still deny Gaga's impact
I hope this also touches on Gaga's privilege as a straight-presenting woman to the world (that's how she's perceived) and on her entitlement towards using gay people as props at points ("thank God and the gays!", "let's make this song for the gays!").
I hope this also touches on Gaga's privilege as a straight-presenting woman to the world (that's how she's perceived) and on her entitlement towards using gay people as props at points ("thank God and the gays!", "let's make this song for the gays!").
I hope this also touches on Gaga's privilege as a straight-presenting woman to the world (that's how she's perceived) and on her entitlement towards using gay people as props at points ("thank God and the gays!", "let's make this song for the gays!").
She has NEVER said "Let's make this song for the gays"
I hope this also touches on Gaga's privilege as a straight-presenting woman to the world (that's how she's perceived) and on her entitlement towards using gay people as props at points ("thank God and the gays!", "let's make this song for the gays!").
Are you implying she's wrong for thanking God and the gays? That would be complimentary, no?
But that description makes me gag. It's literally like whoever wrote it used a thesaurus for every word and picked out the most "smart sounding" one. Good writing is clear and concise, not pseudo-intellectual dribble.
But that description makes me gag. It's literally like whoever wrote it used a thesaurus for every word and picked out the most "smart sounding" one. Good writing is clear and concise, not pseudo-intellectual dribble.
Ya... that's just academic writing though. It's always like that.
