So girls, where did life (animals, bacteria, trees, anything living.) come from?

The good Lord above imo.

Evolution is NOT a valid answer FOR THIS THREAD as it doesn't explain where the thing that evolved into everything else came from. This is not about whether humans evolved or were created, it's about where LIFE came from, please understand that before making unnecessary posts coming for the OP. Thank you.

Remember, we don't have any proof for any of these opinions, so don't get too heated.

Please stop. You are really doing the most. You should respect others opinions.

Not y'all trying to drag for a question completely irrelevant to the creation vs. evolution debate. THIS IS ABOUT WHERE LIFE ITSELF CAME FROM. If you can't differentiate the two then, well, that's your problem I guess.

Sis, nobody is taking you seriously because these threads have been attempted far too often on ATRL and it inevitably ends in a mess. If you legit want answers (which seems unlikely), you're looking in the wrong place.

God created everything on Earth, including us.

I'm not looking for answers. Looking for an opinion on where life came from other than the one I already have.



I'm not trying to start anything. I'm legitimately curious as to where other people think life came from. I've grown up just assuming something created all life. I want to open my mind and see what other theories are out there. Sorry if some of you girls see that as flamebait.

The Big Bang created molecule so it came from that.
Carbon + water = life

Pretty much

abiogenesis, Miller-Urey etc.

basically this

there is your answer

The only logical answer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis

"God did it!" is not a valid answer. Don't you think it's funny how the phenomenons in science we attribute to God become less in number as we learn more about the earth?

Learn your science basic theories

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primordial_soup

If you ask this and you answer it with God then may I ask you where God come from?

Tracing the origin of the universe is just similar to finding life outside earth, both yield a near zero probability. There are gazillions of earth-like planets. Some scientists presumptuously go on into estimating up to 17 billion earth-like planets can be found in the milky way galaxy alone. But the the chances of finding INHABITED earth-like planets are practically zero. Not ignoring the possibility of the existence of extraterrestrial life in the universe but the likelihood of finding a planet similar to ours with billions of species, simple and complex, small and large, flourishing is close to none. 96 percent of the universe actually remains still a mystery as of today. Big Bang is the only viable explanation scientists can present about the origin of the universe and even that has a near zero probability. But what happened before the big bang, none of them doesn't hold a clue about. It's actually arrogance to outright dismiss all evidences in front of your eyes suggesting the improbability of life formation without a first causer, outside force, pre-existing energy or however you want to refer God to. Science helps us to comprehend the universe but not the origin of the universe. Science is limited. It does not grant absolute truth but only yields degrees of probability and likelihood.