I am glad for her. Not trying to belittle anything... Its pretty sensible conclusion to make imo that it takes a bit more effort to get those songs charting all on your own/thanks to a starpower of 1 person (in most cases with solo writing credits) as opposed to 2-3.

What kind of list is this? I mean, could somebody please explain?

Rihanna

Especially when many of taylor swifts songs chart for less than a month.

But it still counts just like Nicki's solo and features.
I'm glad Billboard finally made an update to include rihanna.

Because it's a list of Hot 100 entries, not anything significant like top 10's.

Any album track can enter the Hot 100, or any flop single that barely has any exposure in the digital era. People like Aretha Franklin & Mariah had it harder rather than Nicki - their success/peak was during the pre-digital era, where singles did not have as much emphasis and wasn't as easy to chart. Nicki's features clog up about 95% of her total Hot 100's/Top 10's.

Basically, without her features, she wouldn't have even have half of these.

For example:
(from my own memory - if it's incorrect, it's not far off from the original)
38 Top 10's/56 Hot 100 entries. (Madonna isn't a feature junkie - one of those Hot 100 entries is with Britney; she may have another with someone else, but no more than 2 tops. All of the top 10's are hers as solo)

^ impressive - Nicki's is not.

I wonder if she can match the 79 weeks Mariah topped BBH100.