Quote:
Originally posted by Javan
NNNNno.
It's about perspective. Pedophilia by definition is a sexuality. And like gays like to say, sexuality is not a choice. The barriers where someone becomes a pedophile or not is different around the world.
Being against polygomy makes you a hypocrite and I shouldn't have to explain why.
Bestiality argument is weak. Animals are unable to consent to many legal things we do with them. We treat animals lik accessories. Why not accessories of sex?
Incest. You dont have to have children or even have sex to be in an incestous relationship. There are biological implications when gays have sex too, so?
Ignorance,indeed
 |
I know being a pedophile is no less a choice than being gay. But pursuing a relationship like that is a whole different thing. You're harming a child who is unable to consent and more than likely don't understand what they're doing. They're also probably being molested and will have forever lasting emotional scarring
No, please do explain! I'm not even against polygamy, it's just a much different situation compared to a gay relationship.
Because that's RAPE?
at least animals used for their fur die at one point. If you rape an animal you can do it as many times as you want, causing them repeated harm. And before you even try it, yes animals are abused physically in this world but would you rather be abused physically or raped? Yeah
Incest, like polygamy, I'm also not really against (as long as both parties are consenting of course). But having a kid with genetic disease is much worse than having no kid at all.
Try again
I can't read 
