That doesn't mean it'll still be legalized everywhere. :/

was there any need to make it so sexual? just a happy couple smiling would of done good

EDIT: ffff the title change get that hit thread sis

"Gay Marriage Already Won", Iconic!!!

Where do you see sex? There are just kisses and in two pics, lips are barely touching each other.
Or you meant sensual maybe.

Not a tender kiss being sexual

Time.

i just think the point would get across better if they was just smiling holding or something, im just being stupidly picky tho because i know how ignorant people can be.

America, and the entire world should do the same.

Love this cover

Am definitely getting both in stores. Collectors/historical item.

They're trying to be striking and somewhat provocative. Hence the line.

For me, these images are far more impacting than a generic gay couple in tuxedos holding hands.

I think they're trying to portray these gay couples as strong, defiant and passionately in love. Highlighting the romance, not the union.

Girl..............

Iconic, beautiful.

I adore the covers.

It is true we are on our way, but how far do we really have to go?

Oh gerl, I was ready to propose to Zayn.

Yesssssss TIME magazine!

But why didn't they use models