Quote:
Originally posted by Shinning
Because it was a huge smash era and nowadays the Grammys care more about success than quality. I can give you plenty of examples of that.
|
There are plenty examples of the success not being equivalent to a grammy.
I don't know why 4 wasn't at least nominated. It should have been nominated at least 2 times...that said, I don't think she should have won all 6 grammy's from 2009 that night but wasn't one for a soundtrack, though so wouldn't it be 5 grammy's for IASF.
I feel like the grammy's are becoming more political so I agree on that but maybe it didn't have to do with having no hits. Perhaps, the committee re-evaluated things from the past.
I lost respect for the grammy's win Herbie hancock won album of the year and not back to black by Amy so...
Quote:
Originally posted by Nippy'sReceipts
Why did SF win Best Contemporary R&B Album and 4 didnt? SF isnt even R&B 
Does the absence of Matthew have something to do with why Bey was snubbed by the Grammy Committee last year?
4 should have been nominated for Album of the Year IMO |
What is Matthew's position on the committee?
