If this was true, I'm pretty sure those videos would not be floating around youtube right now.
!!!
Like, you're literally trying to tell me that the government is competent enough to destroy two buildings with commercial airliners, but can't keep some videos off YouTube?
So is anyone going to post a non youtube video source or...
Errr, a lot of the sources are videos that were simply put to YouTube. There are some bunk YouTube documentaries, but some are real footage of people testifying for the 9/11 commission, or people of the 9/11 commission themselves talking about how it was set up to fail, etc...
If you REALLY wanted I could find the multimillion lab report that talked about finding oxidized metals and stuff.
Do you all really think the government is competent enough to make this huge cover up? What exactly about their inability to get anything done, no matter how simple, and if it is done, in the most inefficient way possible, leads you to believe they could execute a plan as bold as 9/11? How did they get the pilots to crash into the buildings?
Do you all really think the government is competent enough to make this huge cover up? What exactly about their inability to get anything done, no matter how simple, and if it is done, in the most inefficient way possible, leads you to believe they could execute a plan as bold as 9/11? How did they get the pilots to crash into the buildings?
Nobody has said anything about them getting planes to crash into buildings.
This is where a lot of people get inaccurate information. Most of the conspiracy theories that come from 9/11 are talking about the building that fell and was never even hit by a plane.
AM NOT SAYING I BELIEVE IN THE CONSPIRACY THEORIES.
I use YouTube videos because it puts a lot of sources from different people into one or so videos. Some videos are crap and some actually make a point.
Again, a lot of the sources are simply actual footage put on YouTube. But again, I could show stuff to you if you really wanted.
*actual footage, selectively edited, manipulated, and sequenced to lead people to a certain conclusion because most people in America think watching a video on YouTube qualifies as research.
And yes, people "really want" to see the evidence, I don't know why you keep acting coy about it.
If this was true, I'm pretty sure those videos would not be floating around youtube right now.
Taking videos down would cause even more suspicion though. So if it is true, then they definitely wouldn't do that. The best way to ever convince people something is a lie and/or conspiracy is to just completely debunk their credibility. Not hide their "evidence".
No, never have I thought or heard anyone say it was.
And I watched those videos that 'proved' that there were explosions throughout the building and the firefighters were talking about explosions after the planes hit. Of course there would be explosions. Whoever said they were talking about explosions b4 the collisions obviously didn't watch the videos well enough,
*actual footage, selectively edited, manipulated, and sequenced to lead people to a certain conclusion
No. It's not like videos made by people to prove 9/11 was a conspiracy or anything. Just like videos of people testifying, talking about molten metal, etc. Nothing edited. Just points of reference.
No. It's not like videos made by people to prove 9/11 was a conspiracy or anything. Just like videos of people testifying, talking about molten metal, etc. Nothing edited. Just points of reference.
Then post it. Or better yet, post this non-YouTube evidence you keep claiming you have.
I don't think anything of it, though.