a true queen lends her success to less fortunate acts.

It would have gone #1 anyway, her feature was unneeded.

Yes it still would have smashed without her.

Misery is far better, so catchy and wasn't even top 10.

Of course not.

I don't think so. Is she soley responsible? No, but the song reminds me of crazy in love in that it was a bit borderline (the horns in crazy in love were great but the actual melody is dull) but the bridge was able to push it over the edge from being okay to good

Absolutely NOT!

How many weeks has 'One More Night' been #1?

no

beacuse wvwrytime I go to karaoke with my friends, co workers, and new friend, new co worker

they only sing Christina's part



they love em so much

9 including this week. It will stop at 9 though.

Misery went #8 on Pop, not a smash but a solid hit.

YES.

Obviously YES. Look at how Payphone or One more night has done-

Yes, Maroon 5 is a force, and didn't they promote the single without Xtina? This is a no-brainer.

yes.

Yes

I can't at this explicit content (Christina's nipple ring )

Of course Maroon 5 would've reached the top. Payphone almost did, Makes Me Wonder did, and One More Night did (all for more than 1 week). Christina didn't determine the songs success. In fact, she should've gotten Adam for a collaboration for her album too (Adam/Maroon 5 >>>>>>>>>>>>>. Cee-Lo & Blake Shelton).