omg he's straight

Imagine all the hot guys he could get

I kinda prefer women wearing women's clothes. Just my opinion.

Plus you could tell fron his hands its a dude anyway.

But those things are just a bunch of silly social constructs and products of false dichotomies that don't actually exist. (You, of course, can believe what you feel like believing.)

Although, the intention is to be androgynous.

Greek roots: Andr-: Man + Gune-: Woman = Androgynous

The androgynous model is supposed to slip between the gender binary. (Which I think is pretty awesome. But that's of course just my opinion.)

Interesting. Please continue.

I know what androgynous means. I dont mess with it, but it is what it is.

The concepts most people have of "male" and "female" are products of society; gender roles, for example -- the old idea that women should stay in the kitchen and men should bring in the money. There is nothing logical about gender roles; there is nothing natural or free-flowing about them. They have been created by society. They are social constructs.

It's like that with all of our concepts of what's "masculine" or "feminine." The old, "guys wear blue, girls wear pink" thing -- there is no mechanism in the mind that predisposes girls to want pink things. Society says girls should have pink things, and want to have pink things, so they are given pink things. Social construct.

Soooo what do we get from all this? Gender itself is a social construct. Masculinity and femininity do not exist -- they're things we've made up.

It's important to realize that gender is separate from sex, though -- sex involves biology, chromosomes -- whether you have a penis or a vagina or something in between.

Although society hates it, based on the social construct of gender -- a boy can have a vagina. A girl can have a penis. Some people choose not to identify with those terms at all. They identify somewhere in-between, or maybe they identify with nothing at all -- like sexuality, gender is a spectrum. All dichotomies are false dichotomies, in the long run.

Wow.



Interesting perspective. I have to disagree on some points though.

The only ways your logic works is if you separate sex from gender, which is pretty much impossible. Sex is what gender is pretty much based upon. Because women are the fairer sex, they expected to wear lighter colored clothes, or perform jobs that are require less muscle. (Its obviously not the case all the time, but whatever).

You say all social constructs are false. Laws are social constructs. Health and safety policies are social constructs. Hell, chivalry can be called a social construct. These things exist for a reason. Its not perfect, but its required. So youre saying that it's cool for guys to knuckle up with women and fight? I mean masculinity and femininity dont exist to you If that was true, then guys would be able to give birth. Women would be able to make sperm.

As as*hole-ish as this may sound, you can identify and not identify with whatever you want (or dont want.) You cant change science, you cant change sex. And gender is based on sex. You cant acknowledge one, then cover the other one like it doesnt exist. Theyre pretty much hand in hand. Gender roles my change over time, but theyre still rules. Thats just how I see it.

Really?



You can do better.

oh wow


werqq it!

Good for him and society, break down those gender roles

That wasn't me, I swear.

Reminds me of this

Damn he is beautiful

Gorgeous.