So if you were a professional singer would you be a
studio singer(with a lot of help from autotune),
a live powerhouse(little to no vocal help/autotune)
or both?
I can actually be both, but I might actually be better at live vocals than studio vocals because I'd rather sing out instead of singing condensed and autotuned.
Studio-wise, I'd like my voice to be as perfect as possible, I wouldn't overdue it with the autotune but a little wouldn't hurt. As far as live goes, I'd give the people what they payed for and came to see.
Heck I might pre-record a performance and have them hologram that **** in.....#lazypopstarproblems
Quote:
Originally posted by rbautz
Why both, If you are a Live Powerhouse you don't need auto-tune and sound like a duck.
Sis the girls ain't busting a vocal cord trying to give angel vocals when they can give peasant chants and the engineer can fix it to sound like your live voice.....
I'd be studio just cause I ain't tryna stand on anybody stage singing my heart out in front of strangers. But I'll do it in a dim candle light booth. Where people don't know the face behind the voice.
Sis the girls ain't busting a vocal cord trying to give angel vocals when they can give peasant chants and the engineer can fix it to sound like your live voice.....
