Quote:
Originally posted by Phoenetic
We aren't here to dictate people's sense of humour, we are here to stop people from being insensitive.
You are right you weren't directly laughing at the family that died, but you were indirectly laughing at it.
Insensitive:
Even if you might not realize it, what you said was mean to a particular group of people.
It was insensitive. it won't be reversed.
How is that spectacular?  |
But I wasn't indirectly laughing at anything though. If I wanted to laugh at the topic at hand, I would have just responded to the post and laughed but I didn't. I specifically quoted something humorous that I found funny and laughed at that. I was laughing directly at what I was laughing at. There isn't a grey area here. Nor was anything I said mean in any way shape or form, considering I didn't even say it but get them new warning validations! This is like going to a Dave Chapelle show and scolding the audience (one specific member at that) for laughing at Dave Chapelle's R Kelly jokes because by laughing at the obvious joke, they're being "indirectly insensitive" What type of nonsense?
I love how me laughing at something that was clearly humurous is
insensitive
yet people on this site can maliciously call others coons, ******s and say other ridiculously racist and offensive **** without consequence.
No shade was intended 
