Originally posted by ABEL-o-matic

Even if it's not worthy of a point for insensitive, it is still a good enough post to warn because it's pointless co-signing and disruptive.

Originally posted by Melodramatic

This blog has 13 pages of nonsense and tomfoolery.
http://atrl.net/forums/blog.php?b=10909

Originally posted by Clump

Shouldn't mods answer questions? You don't go to concerts to see groupies.

Originally posted by Kunt.

Abel is giving me hall monitor teas right now.

Originally posted by FAME.

So the entire thread should be warned if that's the case because 90% of the thread consists of people responding and reacting to said comment just as I did. But since they aren't, there is no reason why mine should have been.

Originally posted by Jack.

More like Vato's bitch teas.

Originally posted by ABEL-o-matic

I guess. Feel free to report those posts if you feel they're off-topic or insensitive.

Originally posted by FAME.

Why did I get a warning for this?

http://atrl.net/forums/showthread.ph...0#post11882510

1. I didn't even say anything insensitive.
2. According to your definition

It implies that I had to say something mean and considering I didn't even say anything How is what I said mean?
3.. How are you going to tell me what how sensitive I am obligated to be about something anyway? That's a personal thing. Some people are more sensitive and others and vice versa. To some death is a big deal, to some it's part of every day life. The hell. Just because you feel some emotional type of way about a situation doesn't at all mean that I'm obligated to feel or treat it the same way.
4. No one else who laughed (aka the entire thread) got a warning point
5. I would like someone to explain to me how laughing at something I find funny is wrong especially when there is something called Dark Humor that people make a LIVING out of doing. There are inappropriate jokes all the time, why am I being penalized when I didn't even make the joke?

Originally posted by ABEL-o-matic

http://atrl.net/?t=233128

If I'm a moderator, I would give you a Reminder instead because this is a new regulation and everyone will "offend" the jurisdictions for the first time. Try sending a Help Request.

Originally posted by RIHDRAKEBRITUSH

No I was NEVER given a reminder and from what I read, the new rules was posted 9/26/2012 which was a few days ago. I feel the MOD's (no disrespect) are partial to certain people. I bet if someone else posted the same thing, he would be given a reminder, but nope not the Usher fans. They approve almost EVERY report made towards them and funny enough I can count with my fingers how many times I have reported since I joined this forum.

Originally posted by FAME.

But I don't
That's the entire point of my original statement. None of them should be warned because *insert my first post here*

Originally posted by ABEL-o-matic

I feel for you I know I how you feel, because Buble's base is so dead, and I can't risk a WP for posting there unless there is news.

Originally posted by FAME.

But I don't
That's the entire point of my original statement. None of them should be warned because *insert my first post here*

Originally posted by Melodramatic

This blog has 13 pages of nonsense and tomfoolery.
http://atrl.net/forums/blog.php?b=10909

Originally posted by rihannafan

Your WP was deserved, stop it.

Originally posted by FAME.

But it really wasn't though. I said nothing insensitive and nobody else who reacted the same exact way got a warning. Therefore NOPE.

Originally posted by ABEL-o-matic

I just said that even if it's not insensitive, you'd still get warned for pointless co-signing.

Originally posted by FAME.

But it really wasn't though. I said nothing mean and nobody else who reacted the same exact way got a warning. Therefore NOPE.

Originally posted by BlazingLovatic

There's a little glitch with the mobile site. When something's been warned it still says reported

Originally posted by Clump

Shouldn't mods answer questions? You don't go to concerts to see groupies.