I don't get the point of it... isn't it a GOOD thing to have a low number of number 1 albums to singles?
Like, Katy only has 2 albums. So by your logic, if this was August 2010, Katy would be a good album seller because she'd have 1 number 1 album and 2 number 1 singles? So its GOOD to have flop singles?
What?
I don't get this.
Exactly. This list is flawed. Get into those 44 number ones by the Queen tho. We dont do flop singles.
Because I never brought up Britney. I mean her album sales were mediocre after 2004 also but that doesn't make J.Lo's any more successful.
Why did you bring Madonna in the first place then? She had an album that sold more than Britney and JLo's post 2004. & pretty much all of the popgirls'. Stop trolling.
I don't get the point of it... isn't it a GOOD thing to have a low number of number 1 albums to singles?
Like, Katy only has 2 albums. So by your logic, if this was August 2010, Katy would be a good album seller because she'd have 1 number 1 album and 2 number 1 singles? So its GOOD to have flop singles?
What?
I don't get this.
This doesn't mean anything, just look at some of the artists in the 11-7 positions, they currently can't sell albums nor singles
Why did you bring Madonna in the first place then? She had an album that sold more than Britney and JLo's post 2004. & pretty much all of the popgirls'. Stop trolling.
All the pop girls are flops at his logic The Immaculate Collection sold more than everyone's albums. Everyone else are flops if they haven't outsold it
Why did you bring Madonna in the first place then? She had an album that sold more than Britney and JLo's post 2004. & pretty much all of the popgirls'. Stop trolling.
I was trying to make a point by saying that J.Lo's sales were lackluster in comparison to her contemporaries who released records in the same year. Madonna and Mariah were 2 of those contemporaries. Britney didn't release anything in 2005.