I don't understand why manipulating the capatalisation status of letters in a word wouldn't be allowed - since you're ultimately not changing the word - yet taking the start of a word and changing it for a single letter formally absent from said word is allowed, such in the case of 'Xtina'?
I think if 'Xtina' is allowed, something like 'chriSTIna' should be allowed.
I don't understand why manipulating the capatalisation status of letters in a word wouldn't be allowed - since you're ultimately not changing the word - yet taking the start of a word and changing it for a single letter formally absent from said word is allowed, such in the case of 'Xtina'?
I think if 'Xtina' is allowed, something like 'chriSTIna' should be allowed.
I understand why something like that would not be allowed. But why is 'Xtina' allowed when it's clearly a nickname, yet something that changes a word far less not, despite its implications?
I understand why something like that would not be allowed. But why is 'Xtina' allowed when it's clearly a nickname, yet something that changes a word far less not, despite its implications?
Xtina has been around since 2002. That's the difference.
@ the people that troll the most on ATRL coexisting, love it.
