Quote:
Originally posted by Benjamin
 The mess in here. The arguments are so stupid that I can hardly begin to fight them. If the baby was killed solely because she was base jumping (IE, the air pressure causing a miscarriage or something), then yes, you can accuse her of whatever you like. However, the baby was only harmed because of a freak accident which is exactly like the car analogies Jameson Teqkilla was talking about so you can't really assault her something she couldn't have possibly known would happen. I'm pretty damn sure that she asked professionals before doing the jump. She wouldn't have done it if there was a chance the baby would've been harmed (in anything other than a freak accident, in which case you might as well argue the sport is banned and not just about this one incident).
Seriously, pay your regards and move on. Utter mess.
RIP. |
Ugh. Again, it is a HIGH-RISK SPORT, and in this case there was a 990 FOOT DROP. I've already explained how it is not like the car anaology, so if you're going to refute the specifics of what I wrote you're going to have to give actual reasoning other than it was a "freak accident" (to reiterate: It's not the same as the car analogies you keep saying because it's harder to avoid using transportation in your nine months of pregnancy than it is to avoid doing a high-risk sport like base jumping for nine months). She clearly knew there was a chance the baby could be harmed if you actually read the woman's previous comments on base jumping (I'll make it even easier for you than if you'd just read my post above your one: "I only feel alive when I jump. I find normal life boring. I know that death always flies with me but we only have a certain amount of time on the earth. When the sun goes down then it's game over whoever you are"). Read the arguments more carefully before jumping in with irrational responses.
