Umm...Idk what to say.Some of that is true,some is bullsh!t.
And lbr,when was the last time Gaga did something that had hoopla surrounding it?It's been a while.Doesn't it feel like she has kind of lost the ability to seriously 'shock'?It isn't working that well now.I mean,people already expect her to try to 'shock' them,so they're more like 'yawn,next' instead of 'OH MY GOD WTF?' .The future of her career is really uncertain,we can only hope.

I dont agree except for the part in the article about Madonna being bitter, angry and insecure.

Obviously this person's musical knowledge doesn't extend beyond Gaga and Madonna.

In fact, this person doesn't seem to know about Madonna's history.

I agree that Gaga is better than what Madonna is currently serving us up with (although we'll have to wait for ARTPOP to properly judge), but the author of this article comes off as being a bit childish and limited in their sense of music and pop culture history.

And since when did "Like a Virgin" sound anything like "Billie Jean"? Talk about reaching. There are much better and well-known examples of Madonna biting other people's ideas, and this is what they could come up with? Is the writer a 12-year-old?

THIS ARTICLE IS CORRECT.

Uhuh.

What is this mess

Madonna>>>Gaga

It will always be this way.

ok

No no no no no !

Madonna is a completely different artist to Gaga.

Madonna is known, respected and admired for her longevity first and foremost. You can only reach 'Madonna-status' when you have a top ten single 30 years on.

I hear similarities with Poker Face too.

+1

like any other day.
like any other member.
and yet, they're sure about Gaga's career and stability.

btw since when did Celebria became the place for opinion by someone random? Should I write my article with more facts, post it on blogspot and re post it here with a source?

2 wp for Andre.

You need at least 20 years in the industry to be the "next" madonna

The title now is no better.