So, with good intentions and all, I post a negative BTW ball review just to see the other side of the story in the appropriate thread, and a monster reports me What kind of nonsense?
You know damn well you were just trolling. : If you were really that concerned with seeing ''the other side of the story'', you would've A: Posted a review from a legitimate source and/or B: Posted a review that wasn't 3 months old.
You know damn well you were just trolling. : If you were really that concerned with seeing ''the other side of the story'', you would've A: Posted a review from a legitimate source and/or B: Posted a review that wasn't 3 months old.
since when do i troll
why does the date of the review matter?
A review is a review whether it was from a critic or a blogger or whatever.
Can we trial a thread for 24 hours where the Hive and Navy have at it with no limitations? It would be interesting and could be closed from the public to keep the ads.
Can we trial a thread for 24 hours where the Hive and Navy have at it with no limitations? It would be interesting and could be closed from the public to keep the ads.
A review is a review whether it was from a critic or a blogger or whatever.
You're right, actually. The date of the review is irrelevant. But why did you have to go back so far to find a negative review instead of finding one from her more recent European shows? Is it because there are none to be found? And the source of the review does indeed matter. We don't post positive blogger reviews about the BTWB, so why should we make an exception for negative ones?
Good idea!
I'd just sit in there with my popcorn and watch the carnage.
It would be so fun.
Quote:
Originally posted by Haven17
You're right, actually. The date of the review is irrelevant. But why did you have to go back so far to find a negative review instead of finding one from her more recent European shows? Is it because there are none to be found? And the source of the review does indeed matter. We don't post positive blogger reviews about the BTWB, so why should we make an exception for negative ones?
If rihannafan wanted to get a better reaction he should've just posted that review in SYG (if he hasn't already). I sure most people would've had a feast quoting every single line from it accompanied by laughing smiles and some cliché flame-bait statement commonly used for Gaga.
Quote:
Originally posted by jomarr
Do we have a chat here already?
I can still access it by typing atrl.net on my browser. I wouldn't know how to get at it after cleaning my cache, though.
What kind of nonsense? 
If you were really that concerned with seeing ''the other side of the story'', you would've A: Posted a review from a legitimate source and/or B: Posted a review that wasn't 3 months old.
And the source of the review does indeed matter. We don't post positive blogger reviews about the BTWB, so why should we make an exception for negative ones?
