Back to ATRL
This is
Classic ATRL
, an interactive archive of our original website.
Music News
Charts
Videos
Celebria
Base
The Lounge
Best Of
YTT
Games
TRL Archive
User Name
Remember Me
Password
Members who joined ATRL prior to 2017, sign in here.
Any changes made to your password do not sync.
Classic ATRL
>
The Lounge
>
ATRL: Why can't we have images in our signatures?
Sign In
ATRL: Why can't we have images in our signatures?
Last Post
Actions
Scorpio
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 17,142
Thread Starter
|
Post #1
Why can't we have images in our signatures?
The title says it all.
family.guy123
Member Since: 3/15/2009
Posts: 4,228
Post #2
that would be retarded
feuxtography
Member Since: 3/17/2012
Posts: 10,399
Post #3
Because everyones huge file-size AV's already make ATRL implode on itself a few times a day.
Katamari
Member Since: 5/8/2012
Posts: 15,801
Post #4
ew
Sloth
Member Since: 6/1/2012
Posts: 6,899
Post #5
Because that's tacky as hell.
Scorpio
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 17,142
Thread Starter
|
Post #6
Quote:
Originally posted by
family.guy123
that would be retarded
No. Many other forums have that and it looks nice (sometimes
) ...
Blueberry Mary
Member Since: 2/23/2012
Posts: 7,699
Post #7
I thought it would be a good idea
jagger88788
Member Since: 11/11/2011
Posts: 6,524
Post #8
It would be a damn mess.
Scorpio
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 17,142
Thread Starter
|
Post #9
We could have great images from our favorite artists instead of writing their names. I mean small little pics. It wouldn't hurt anyone..
Signs
Member Since: 1/1/2012
Posts: 3,878
Post #10
Quote:
Originally posted by
feuxtography
Because everyones huge file-size AV's already make ATRL implode on itself a few times a day.
This.
Scorpio
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 17,142
Thread Starter
|
Post #11
ATRL is in desperate need of a new design, tbh. But I would be happy with images in sig already..
Guero
Member Since: 3/30/2011
Posts: 33,325
Post #12
Cause they're gross.
Chickenchiki
Member Since: 3/9/2011
Posts: 4,876
Post #13
Because it would make ATRL look cheap.
vuelve88
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
Post #14
It might be too costly.
YourMadGesty
Member Since: 8/4/2010
Posts: 12,356
Post #15
'Cɑuse some gerls still function on Windows 98
And ɑdded virtuɑl memory might cɑuse their cpu to instɑneously burn.
Scorpio
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 17,142
Thread Starter
|
Post #16
Quote:
Originally posted by
YourϺɑdGesty 2.0
'Cɑuse some gerls still function on Windows 98
And ɑdded virtuɑl memory might cɑuse their cpu to instɑneously burn.
fineandbambi
Member Since: 11/4/2011
Posts: 4,121
Post #17
Because it would make atrl slower and uglier.
Scorpio
Member Since: 8/20/2011
Posts: 17,142
Thread Starter
|
Post #18
Quote:
Originally posted by
fineandbambi
Because it would make atrl slower and
uglier
.
Not if they use classy pictures that show some kind of effort.
fabian_phipps
Member Since: 9/18/2010
Posts: 12,628
Post #19
Why would you want ATRL to look even more Tacky? (This is not shade to the admins and mods (well..
) btw, more to some of our members.
Lee!!
ATRL Moderator
Member Since: 11/16/2004
Posts: 28,450
Post #20
Quote:
Will ATRL ever allow images in signatures?
No. They make websites look so unprofessional and out-of-control. We will never, ever allow it.
http://atrl.net/forums/generalfaq.php#profilefaq
Next time take it to HQ
Actions for this Thread
Print this Thread
"Absolute TRL" 1999-2006; "Popfusion" 2006-2007; "ATRL" 2007-present
) ...
) btw, more to some of our members.