Quote:
Originally posted by TheAqua
I wish people would stop that shyt.Beyonce has been in the game overall for 14 years,but she's been a solo artist for like 8. Beyonce was the lead singer,but she wasn't the only one in DC people.Stop adding that to her solo career( I'm lookin a you Behyive >___________>)
Hell Kelly Rowland's been a solo artist longer than Bey....though does that make her the better artist overall?
No..
Longevity doesn't always equate to beigng the better of the latter.
I will say Bey for now,Simply because while she might not have as mnay albums or hist as Rihanna,her music is more memorable and timeless.Where as Rihanna gives in to current trends that WILL sound dated sooner or later.No only that but when Rihanna gets to be of legndary status and she an becomes older.... Ima be honest with some of yall Navy.... most of her songs are gonna sound too ratched for a 50 yr old( oops look @ Madge,my badd ya'll) to be singing.
Though Bey fans get on my nerve sometiems,they stay hyping her to MJ levels ...SMH 
Beyonce has shown that she has staying power,but I wouldn't count Ri out so quickly no matter how generic her music may be at times |
Beyonce has a 15 year music career. She could have been the Michelle of Destiny's Child and those first 6 years of DC will still be apart of her career. Everybody knows Beyonce and knows she was apart of Destiny's Child and knows she's been a prominent artist in music since 1997. Don't let your feelings for the hive get in the way of facts.
And what's the point of saying "longevity doesnt equate to being better" then concede that Beyonce is better than Rihanna. I mean...
Because you know Bey would again lose, both in album sales, #1 hits, singles sold and overall records sold 
