Quote:
Originally posted by Dickard
This is irrelevant. The fact of the matter is how marriage is defined in HIS religion.
He's not burning gays at the stake. He simply has a stance against something that isn't traditional marriage. Respect his opinion, hr has infringed on anyone's rights.
|
Yes, informing you that the Bible wasn’t the first to define marriage as you previously and naively stated is irrelevant

. If it was so irrelevant then why did you make your initial claim in the first place? I also informed you that “His religion” has a history of changing its interpretations of the Bible and picking and choosing which religious tenets to follow, and according to you that too is irrelevant. Well, the Bible never really outright condemned slavery, and good Christians who owned slaves loved to point that out as a reason for why slavery was justified. So using the Bible in this instance is rather specious because interpretations of the Bible are not static and have been subject to change. There's also the matter of the separation of church and state, but I digress.
. . . waits patiently for the point to go flying over your head when you eventually reply to me to say how my analogy isn’t relevant because we’re talking about gay marriage and not slavery
And where’s my head-desk gif?
You’re like the 50 millionth person on this thread to try and fail to argue that this is only about one man’s “opinion” when that mess was debunked numerous pages ago. Maybe you need to go back and reread those posts. As others have said before me, this isn’t simply about mere opinion. It’s about money that this business uses to either restrict the rights of people or in some cases outright kill them because their sexual orientation. If you don’t understand what’s going on, just say so, cuz you sure are coming in here with some cornball rebuttals.