I think you have to know English history and have an appreciation for symbolism and stuff. (Not to say you don't, it's just a lot of people don't care for it)
But I loved the Industrial Revolution part, as well as the rings coming together. Honestly the only bad part was the countries because it took forever, but it always does.
Every time I see that Muhammad Ali clip from the 96 Olympics I become teary eyed those few seconds is one of the most memorable event in sports history.
Our greatest musical treasure is French Canadian. U-S-A! U-S-A!
So sorry, girls.
Not that I would have preferred either of those screechers to take Céline's place. I am, however, somewhat surprised that the Atlanta planning committee opted to outsource the talent for that particular occasion. After all, this is America — land of the prideful — and what better way to celebrate our global influence and supposed superiority than a rousing performance by one of our cherished American musicians? Missed opportunity, my patriots!
I realize Céline was selected, not out of some desire to be diplomatic, but because of her immense popularity at the time. That said, I think the performance almost-sorta-kinda registers as an (unintentional) moment of unification, or an (unintentional) act of humility.
And as far as I'm concerned, unity should be the central message of the Olympic games. Yes, the nature sporting events is such that it breeds rivalry, and yes, I realize host countries will always use the games as an opportunity to show-off and bolster national pride, but I do think this idea of togetherness could be better incorporated into most Olympic ceremonies.
I can't say which opening ceremony I prefer. I only vaguely remember anything about the Atlanta games/opening ceremony.
those few seconds is one of the most memorable event in sports history. 
