eh.
Michael Jackson is. He managed to serve great and quality + mainstream timeless pop songs.
Hew else.

plus he speaks english

I could never get into his music. Based on the discussion in this thread, I guess I missed out.

Am I the only one who finds his voice incredibly irritating?

Same !!!
I tried hard to appreciate his music but...

Yes

Im so sick of all these ****ing one-sided threads that make no sense

I don't know about that. He's definitely very good though.

I've been getting into his hits, I'll get into his studio albums soon.

I didn't want to compare him to just one or two people cause that'd look... tacky so I just compared him to everyone.

Stevie Wonder >>>>>>>>>>>> Prince; even Prince knows this.

Lots of other people have been able to serve quality/timeless pop hits.
I'd say Stevie is the runner up.

Nope. Stevie is more talented than Prince. He plays more instruments, is a vocal virtuoso (whereas Prince is not), and is more musically inclined than Prince.

Same. I've listened to a few of his albums, and he's never done it for me.

I didn't see any pole dancing. I am not impressed.

So Stevie plays more than 26 instruments?

But Prince is a great vocalist?

Quite possibly.

Stevie is up there, though. However, i would like to know which instruments does Stevie play besides the piano and harmonica.

No, and neither does Prince.

He is, but not better than Stevie, who is on a totally different [and superior] level.

Comparing Prince to Stevie is like Comparing Pizza and Cake.

They are both amazing at what they do and theyre is no clear cut "better" talent. Stevie did produce a string of albums in the 70s that are amongst the greatest runs in music history, but Prince aint no slouch.

I would put Stevie over Prince. Stevie's vocals alone >>>>>>>>>>.

But Stevie IS the better talent between the two.

Stevie aint pop though.