I wasn't mad. I was dying of laughter.
but thank you regardless. and I thought it was on topic. was it because about the canadian part of the comment?
Oh no, I misunderstood the purpose of the thread.
I assume when someone reverses the warning, you can't see the reason they give?
I should probably PM members when I reverse their warnings, so they know.
This is scaring me mods. I am scared to post so much now because I am scared of being warned and banned. Just say someone starts reporting everyone with "Annoying" and a mod agrees. Is that even up for discussion to be reversed.
No shade, but just last month EVERYONE was getting away with these people are being warned for today. If there are going to be rules, that are clear, atleast enforce them year round. That really isn't fair
There are a lot of policies on this forum,
but they are really necessary, those only-gif/smileys-posts
were out of control lately, I saw a lot of threads where the first page
was full of 1-gif-posts, which was kinda weird, well, at least in my opinion.
but they are really necessary, those only-gif/smileys-posts
No, these extra rules aren't really necessary. why does it offend you and/or the mods if someone posts a gif-only post? Like seriously, people should start taking things a bit more loosely in here
That's what you would think, but going around making a case about how unfair the mods are with a constant anti-mod sign-off would be entirely counterproductive. I don't get it.
You do realize it's getting to a point where the mods are starting to dictate HOW we speak our minds right? Apparently there's a "pointless" way to express your thoughts and a "proper" way.
Well, they stated that if you add proper text in you post to state your point on the topic then it's not pointless. Whether those words get you a WP or not, that's another thing.
Well, they stated that if you add proper text in you post to state your point on the topic then it's not pointless. Whether those words get you a WP or not, that's another thing.
I guess.
The adage "A picture is worth a thousand words" refers to the notion that a complex idea can be conveyed with just a single still image.
It also aptly characterizes one of the main goals of visualization, namely making it possible to absorb large amounts of data quickly.
Those points should be reversed. We have been doing this for how long? And we have never received warnings or even reminders for being off-topic.
Exactly. I wasn't aware that SYG was ONLY for bashing other artists.
We were discussing how attractive male celebrities were, and some people agreed, some didn't. I don't get this ****.
This is scaring me mods. I am scared to post so much now because I am scared of being warned and banned. Just say someone starts reporting everyone with "Annoying" and a mod agrees. Is that even up for discussion to be reversed. 
YOU CAUSED THIS!
Only one of them was really deserved IMO. What's up with the crackdown? 
