Back to ATRL
This is
Classic ATRL
, an interactive archive of our original website.
Music News
Charts
Videos
Celebria
Base
The Lounge
Best Of
YTT
Games
TRL Archive
User Name
Remember Me
Password
Members who joined ATRL prior to 2017, sign in here.
Any changes made to your password do not sync.
Classic ATRL
>
Music News
>
Theory about the Grammys
Sign In
Theory about the Grammys
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Next >
Last Post
Actions
LLJungleFever
Member Since: 2/14/2005
Posts: 1,389
Thread Starter
|
Post #1
Theory about the Grammys
Anyone who performs WILL win multiple awards:
Mariah - 3
John Legend - 3
Kanye - 3
U2 - 3
Kelly - 2
Mikal
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 9/24/2001
Posts: 10,763
Post #2
You must be new to Earth
LLJungleFever
Member Since: 2/14/2005
Posts: 1,389
Thread Starter
|
Post #3
lol, I should have thought it lol
Tightrope
Banned
Member Since: 10/21/2001
Posts: 25,547
Post #4
You're late on that. I knew that 4 years ago.
They should let Ashanti perform there. She'll win a whole bunch herself that way
kylie is awesome
Member Since: 11/28/2004
Posts: 263
Post #5
Mariah performed in 1996 with Boyz to Men and went 0/6. Performing doesn't mean ****! ;-)
Tightrope
Banned
Member Since: 10/21/2001
Posts: 25,547
Post #6
Well, a majority of the time in the last 5 years then.
GoldenBoy
Member Since: 4/27/2002
Posts: 4,083
Post #7
Not true? I can name a lot of performers that didn't win anything.
TonyBrownEyes
Member Since: 1/8/2006
Posts: 129
Post #8
Shania Twain didn't win when she performed... can't think of any others yet.. lol
Mikal
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 9/24/2001
Posts: 10,763
Post #9
Ok, so NORMALLY if you perform, you win something.
Hell, when they didn't try to have 50 performances and tributes, if you performed you WON the following presentation.
TonyBrownEyes
Member Since: 1/8/2006
Posts: 129
Post #10
i like it so much more now. it's alot less obvious who winners are going to be, and theres more performance action. And Less crappy speeches..
jeff_ktn
Member Since: 9/16/2004
Posts: 216
Post #11
Madonna didn't win in 2000 (or was it 2001?) when she performed "Music".
Nick The Third
Member Since: 1/3/2004
Posts: 6,932
Post #12
Quote:
Originally posted by
TonyBrownEyes
i like it so much more now.
it's alot less obvious who winners are going to be
, and theres more performance action. And Less crappy speeches..
You're kidding, right? The Grammys this year were so boring and predictable I can't believe I even sat through it.
P.S. U2 won 5 awards (unfortunately), I thought?
goldmember
Member Since: 9/15/2004
Posts: 101
Post #13
Coldplay went home empty handed, and so did Ciara and Paul McCartney.
Mr. Queero
Banned
Member Since: 2/28/2003
Posts: 9,476
Post #14
yea, U2 won 5
Arith
Member Since: 10/19/2004
Posts: 13,032
Post #15
Quote:
Originally posted by
Nalick -n- Attack
You're late on that. I knew that 4 years ago.
They should let Ashanti perform there. She'll win a whole bunch herself that way
I dont think they usually let talentless hacks perform.
Manuel MC Forever
Member Since: 9/18/2004
Posts: 588
Post #16
mariah also perform in 1992 and was nominated and was robbed as usual
Nick
ATRL Senior Member
Member Since: 9/25/2001
Posts: 7,563
Post #17
Britney lost in 1999 too, when she performed FTBOMBH
Travis10
Member Since: 10/5/2005
Posts: 11,422
Post #18
That's illogic, but I did see that pattern.
JDM
ATRL Moderator
Member Since: 12/21/2002
Posts: 20,569
Post #19
They'll also give an award to ANYONE who's dead. True story.
Lose My Breath
Member Since: 10/12/2002
Posts: 21,317
Post #20
Ciara should've won something, poor girl!!!!!!!!!!
Page 1 of 2
1
2
Next >
Actions for this Thread
Print this Thread
"Absolute TRL" 1999-2006; "Popfusion" 2006-2007; "ATRL" 2007-present