While all of this is true, you might want to add a source for those statements Princess MaRy.
Also, it was the 1950s-1980s. Virtually everyone, especially men in politics and military outfits, was a homophobe. It was a social norm. If you can find any leader who openly supported LGBT rights then we might actually have something new to disquss.
While all of this is true, you might want to add a source for those statements Princess MaRy.
Also, it was the 1950s-1980s. Virtually everyone, especially men in politics and military outfits, was a homophobe. It was a social norm. If you can find any leader who openly supported LGBT rights then we might actually have something new to disquss.
Source is CBC radio Canada, they said this happened in 1980 a time when gays were actually gaining rights in other countries..,
Why would being "against apartheid" be a bad thing? Since when was apartheid good?
no dat is wonderful but he only did it to look good for da world when he was such a racist piece of ****
rounding up people to shoot because they're black is not a cute look
no dat is wonderful but he only did it to look good for da world when he was such a racist piece of ****
rounding up people to shoot because they're black is not a cute look
Gotcha. I misunderstood.
And yes, heroes and/or good men they were NOT. Anyone who thinks so does that just because they're ignorant about history. The commodification and glorification of Che is ridiculous and annoying.
And yes, heroes and/or good men they were NOT. Anyone who thinks so does that just because they're ignorant about history. The commodification and glorification of Che is ridiculous and annoying.
Ugh horrible miswording by my part i do apologize
I'm jus tired of da Colin Kaepernicks of da world talkin when they don't kno ****