|
Timberlake Hits Big With 'End of Time'
Member Since: 6/16/2006
Posts: 8,691
|
All I have to say is it will be great to hear some new Michael Jackson music pretty soon. Trouble is he'll shoot music videos as well most likely. And all the music videos he makes will look like Thriller, if you know what I mean
|
|
|
Member Since: 1/27/2006
Posts: 51,546
|
yea they'll have a story-line. too bad justin, usher, and chris all copied him with that.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/5/2006
Posts: 63,266
|
UTEOT should be #1 BB and have a video now !!!
So Happy for Justin !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Lovestoned is still on top 20 and probably will go up this week while UTEOT is still climbing !!!
He's the king of POP-BUSINESS now !!! Micheal is also too !!!
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/10/2001
Posts: 3,565
|
i never liked UTEOT until i heard it live...but now i love it..his voice sounds amazing in it especially live
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hot.Young.Thing
Micheal is the King Of Music let alone Pop.
|
LOL, what a load of BS. Do human beings like you actually think or do you make it your duty to jump onto bandwagons and say ridiculous statements as if they are actually true?
The Beatles PWN Michael Jackson. They were one of the most talented and prolific groups of all time, and they consistently released wonderful material album after album (something Michael fails at horribly).
For you to throw around "Michael is the King Of Music" is something worthy of a nice slap to your senses. Or in the least, it'll knock you down a peg, maybe even scoot you off the bandwagon a bit. There are MANY MANY artists/groups that are better than Michael Jackson.
|
|
|
Member Since: 9/15/2006
Posts: 27,205
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
Quote:
Originally posted by vuelve88
LOL, what a load of BS. Do human beings like you actually think or do you make it your duty to jump onto bandwagons and say ridiculous statements as if they are actually true?
The Beatles PWN Michael Jackson. They were one of the most talented and prolific groups of all time, and they consistently released wonderful material album after album (something Michael fails at horribly).
For you to throw around "Michael is the King Of Music" is something worthy of a nice slap to your senses. Or in the least, it'll knock you down a peg, maybe even scoot you off the bandwagon a bit. There are MANY MANY artists/groups that are better than Michael Jackson.
|
********. And Michael was a solo aritst. You can't compare him to The Beatles.
And btw, Usher has always been an RnB aritst more than a Pop artist. He can't be representing Pop music as a genre anyway.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by It's London Bitch
********. And Michael was a solo aritst. You can't compare him to The Beatles.
|
Ummm, I just did. If some 'tard wants to throw around the term "King of Music" I mighty well can compare Michael Jackson to anyone. And if you want to be a d*ck and say it's not fair to compare a solo artist to a group, then I'll slim it down to John Lennon, the creative force behind The Beatles, who penned nearly all the music for the band as well as doing vocals, who, despite having his life ended early, still released MORE SOLO ALBUMS than Michael Jackson (Lennon was an amazingly talented and prolific artist) featuring wonderful works (such as the still relevant "Imagine"). John Lennon is the King of Music before Michael Jackson is. No contest.
Care to confront me again? You will lose. Outrageous statements won't work this time around. Sorry, bandwagon jumpers.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
Quote:
Originally posted by vuelve88
Ummm, I just did. If some 'tard wants to throw around the term "King of Music" I mighty well can compare Michael Jackson to anyone. And if you want to be a d*ck and say it's not fair to compare a solo artist to a group, then I'll slim it down to John Lennon, the creative force behind The Beatles, who penned nearly all the music for the band as well as doing vocals, who, despite having his life ended early, still released MORE SOLO ALBUMS than Michael Jackson (Lennon was an amazingly talented and prolific artist) featuring wonderful works (such as the still relevant "Imagine"). John Lennon is the King of Music before Michael Jackson is. No contest.
Care to confront me again? You will lose. Outrageous statements won't work this time around. Sorry, bandwagon jumpers.
|
The fact that you get crazy over someone's comment because they THINK that Michael is the "King of Music", yet you state your OWN opinion as a fact makes you seem to me as an angry troll. You just said that Michael has failed in consistently releasing wonderful material? BITCH PLEASE.
If you say John Lennon is the "King Of Music" , I'd say Elvis was the King of Music before him. Somebody else would THINK Marvin Gaye is. Even Rolling Stone has had Michael & Madonna ahead of John Lennon in their 100 Greatest Artists of all Time list. It's an endless loop and it's a matter of opinion at the end of the day. Each one of them was a King at a time and had a noticable impact on music, Michael was the king of music for more than two decades and he influenced tons of aritsts. You don't have to be a "bandwagon jumper" to say that he is the King of Music. It's called opinion. So yeah , the only dick here is YOU.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by It's London Bitch
The fact that you get crazy over someone's comment because they THINK that Michael is the "King of Music", yet you state your OWN opinion as a fact makes you seem to me as an angry troll. You just said that Michael has failed in consistently releasing wonderful material? BITCH PLEASE.
If you say John Lennon is the "King Of Music" , I'd say Elvis was the King of Music before him. Somebody else would THINK Marvin Gaye is. Even Rolling Stone has had Michael & Madonna ahead of John Lennon in their 100 Greatest Artists of all Time list. It's an endless loop and it's a matter of opinion at the end of the day. Each one of them was a King at a time and had a noticable impact on music, Michael was the king of music for more than two decades and he influenced tons of aritsts. You don't have to be a "bandwagon jumper" to say that he is the King of Music. It's called opinion. So yeah , the only dick here is YOU.
|
I never said John Lennon is the "King of Music", douche. Learn to read. I said he is before Michael Jackson, backing my original statement that there are many artists better than MJ. This is simply a case of 'tards (you) going with the flow without actually thinking.
You're such a dumb wh*re. And please don't try to educate me on the meaning of the word "opinion". I'm attending a Top 20 U.S. University. I think I know what the word "opinion" means. I'm simply knocking down people who have dumb opinions. Understand?
|
|
|
Member Since: 7/20/2007
Posts: 1,722
|
go Justin!! you're awsome!!
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
Quote:
Originally posted by vuelve88
I never said John Lennon is the "King of Music", douche. Learn to read. I said he is before Michael Jackson, backing my original statement that there are many artists better than MJ. This is simply a case of 'tards (you) going with the flow without actually thinking.
You're such a dumb wh*re. And please don't try to educate me on the meaning of the word "opinion". I'm attending a Top 20 U.S. University. I think I know what the word "opinion" means. I'm simply knocking down people who have dumb opinions. Understand?
|
You're an immature retard and this is not an opinion , it's a fact. I won't waste my time anymore with a worthless piece of ****.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by It's London Bitch
You're an immature retard and this is not an opinion , it's a fact. I won't waste my time anymore with a worthless piece of ****.
|
Pot calling the kettle black. Your kind of people amuse me, in a pitiful sort of way. I particularly love the last part, seeing the irony in it (me vs. you = I win at life). Nothing you say can hurt me. It actually has an opposite effect of making me laugh (at you).
I like how you cowardly capitulated. Like I said the first time, you had no business questioning me. You were wrong from the get-go.
Hey, I think a new bandwagon pulled up! Go jump on it. Tickle your fickle self silly.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
^ LMFAO. X infinity.
You seriously have issues.
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
|
Do you get your comments from a bag? Like, just draw them out w/o thinking? That would help explain things.
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/9/2004
Posts: 21,889
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 3/17/2007
Posts: 18,147
|
WAIT FOR ME!
*grabs popcorn*
oh damn I forgot my coke
|
|
|
Member Since: 8/14/2007
Posts: 29,341
|
Frank Sinatra is actually the King of music. No one like him. That of course is my opinion, and LMAO at attending a top 20 U.S. university. Schools don't make the students, vuelve88, you'll be a retard even in Harvard.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/16/2006
Posts: 8,691
|
True Usher is an R&B artist but is very popular or at least was very popular when he was putting out music. 7 #1 singles sounds like a pop artist to me though. Not to mention Confessions actually did sell 15 million worldwide. So when I think of pop I think popularity
|
|
|
Member Since: 10/16/2005
Posts: 16,872
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Hyperballad Jay
[b] LMAO at attending a top 20 U.S. university. Schools don't make the students, vuelve88, you'll be a retard even in Harvard.
|
No, if you're at Harvard chances are that you won't be a retard. I got into schools in which 70+% of applicants, valedictorians and the top of the class, were rejected. Sorry; though it may be easy to throw around words like "retard", it doesn't apply. I've worked to get where I am.
But if it makes you think you're cool, go ahead.
|
|
|
|
|