Gaga all the way. Britney just never had that kind of vocal power, though Britney used to be good...just not as good as Gaga. If Britney had a voice worth acknowledging, it would have been noticed. Even artists who have lost their voice or star power are still regarded as singers. Not so much Britney.
Gaga all the way. Britney just never had that kind of vocal power, though Britney used to be good...just not as good as Gaga. If Britney had a voice worth acknowledging, it would have been noticed. Even artists who have lost their voice or star power are still regarded as singers. Not so much Britney.
And with that comment, you once again prove your complete ignorance of Britney's career (which started when she was a little kid) and her musical background and catalogue.
It's one thing to hate on someone but, at least, make sure you have researched your subject before spewing your nonsense. In the youtube era, you just don't have any excuses for not doing it after all this time.
Britney's voice is wonderful. Then or now, it'll always be one of the most interesting and versatile voice pop music has ever had. It's not because you can't hear it that it's not there and there's more to singing than screaming and belting, it's pop music we're listening to not Broadway's recordings.
As for who is better, I'm not even going to play that game since it's subjective and it depends on the listener tastes but one thing is for sure Britney's singing style suits pop music perfectly and it's a rare talent, nowadays.
Britney can even barely belt and sounds nasally most of the time.
tho if we are comparing this Britney:
That's a different story
Well that's because that's what her label wants her to sound like. I'm not even saying Gaga is a bad vocalist. I'm just saying there's nothing special about her voice. Unlike Britney where her voice is very unique and is very pleasing to listen to.
We are talking about 1999 Britney vs Gaga.
We all know Gaga had robotic vocals as well [receipts: The Fame; Telephone]
But Britney is a pretty talented vocalist before. I really hope she goes into a different route for her next album
And with that comment, you once again prove your complete ignorance of Britney's career (which started when she was a little kid) and her musical background and catalogue.
It's one thing to hate on someone but, at least, make sure you have researched your subject before spewing your nonsense. In the youtube era, you just don't have any excuses for not doing it after all this time.
Britney's voice is wonderful. Then or now, it'll always be one of the most interesting and versatile voice pop music has ever had. It's not because you can't hear it that it's not there and there's more to singing than screaming and belting, it's pop music we're listening to not Broadway's recordings.
As for who is better, I'm not even going to play that game since it's subjective and it depends on the listener tastes but one thing is for sure Britney's singing style suits pop music perfectly and it's a rare talent, nowadays.
On a serious note. I'd like an expert to explain why or how she developed that "baby voice". Its like in her younger years she sounded better than when she starting recording (debuted as an artist). IDK its weird.
On a serious note. I'd like an expert to explain why or how she developed that "baby voice". Its like in her younger years she sounded better than when she starting recording (debuted as an artist). IDK its weird.
Jive wanted her to sing like that.
Anyways, I'm going with gaga. Though Britney sounded decent when she used the baby voice at the beginning of her career. i don't know what the **** happened.
Gaga is obviously a better singer in terms of hitting the right notes and such. But I prefer Britney's voice more. Her voice is so calm and soothing, and she knows how to make a song sound good.
Some Britney fans are so delusional... Gaga is the better vocalist. You know it, I know it, WE ALL KNOW IT. But Britney's voice does suit better for pop music.