[King Maxx]

Originally posted by Bríseis

If the emails are an evidence of her ordering to arm islamists, then yes, its a big deal.

As for her being a great public servant, a good example is Libya => testimony to her decision-making abilities with disastrous consequences for millions of people and then refusing to take the responsibility.

No matter who will win these elections, I fear of the future.

1) I don't know the context of this, but it's irrelevant. The email scandal is pressed by haters for simply using a private server not exactly what was said in them. Again it's just for optics. Has nothing to do with decision making.

2) I'm not going into this Libya debate either, but that has nothing to do with it either. I'm talking about domestic issues. And yes she can handle international affairs. This is something Democrats and Republicans in Congress agree upon. Well they did when she was SOS. The problem with Hillary and foreign policy dates back to every president in modern history before her. So even if you do or don't agree with her Libya decision that still does not take away that she would be a competent POTUS.

3) Fear for the future because of Hillary and the Clinton Foundation? REALLY? I fear for the people who blow those things out of proportion.

To clear this up, email, Benghazi, Clinton Foundation =/= her inability to help everyday Americans. Her policies? Now THAT IS ANOTHER ISSUE and that's what we should be focused on. Would love to see Trump debate her on substance!

[Sirnight]

Never thought Ben Carson would actually make sense one day, and that I would actually agree with him on something

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PdxBUw1dRpU

[King Maxx]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

I thinks it's not a good look for Hillary to give this speech about the "alt-right". She herself probably doesn't even know what it is, but I think could have a really negative outcome. First of all, the alt-right are just twitter trolls and 4chan users. They are not a real-world political organization w/ any real influence. She's giving the speech to hurt Republicans but all she is going to is raise these groups awareness and boost their national profile. That will give them more influence. But maybe that's what she wants.

It is important. They are a big force behind the scenes and these conspiracy people are doing a lot of damage in politics and in everyday life.

She needs to get ahead of the narrative before they get her. And plus if she ties them to Trump it's going to kill any chance of him winning minorities and suburban whites. That "pivot" is what caused her to bring it up. She wouldn't have done it if she didn't need to.

[ariesjow]

Originally posted by keepitundercover

He's being calling Hillary and the Democratic party bigots for his past few rallies

It's such a crazy statement coming from him, but I guess we can already see Stephen Bannon's Breitbart influence on Trump's campaign.

[Sirnight]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

I thinks it's not a good look for Hillary to give this speech about the "alt-right". She herself probably doesn't even know what it is, but I think could have a really negative outcome. First of all, the alt-right are just twitter trolls and 4chan users. They are not a real-world political organization w/ any real influence. She's giving the speech to hurt Republicans but all she is going to is raise these groups awareness and boost their national profile. That will give them more influence. But maybe that's what she wants.

Because ignoring them has worked so well so far lol. The internet is not something separated from the real world, people are fueling this movement, and Trump is unapologetically being their voice. He give them a voice by retweeting them and repeating their talking points. It is a dangerous movement and it deserves to be exposed.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by King Maxx

It is important. They are a big force behind the scenes and these conspiracy people are doing a lot of damage in politics and in everyday life.

She needs to get ahead of the narrative before they get her. And plus if she ties them to Trump it's going to kill any chance of him winning minorities and suburban whites. That "pivot" is what caused her to bring it up. She wouldn't have done it if she didn't need to.

But aren't you worried about after this election? Right now their only force is a few low profile website and twitter and some youtube channels. This isn't the Tea Party/OWS. Hillary is about to get on stage and give them a name and face (probably Milo and his buddies) to the rest of America. Is beating Trump really worth it, she's already ahead by double digits.

[Toxicity.]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

Mark Kirk: US Senator, R-Ill., Likens President Obama to 'Drug Dealer in Chief' for Payment to Iran

The media is calling him the most vulnerable Senator up for re-election in the race
#VoteHaOut

This guy had booths up at every Pride Chicago weekend

[Skywalker]

The alt-right is terrifying. They are just such awful people. Doxxing individuals, hacking their websites, leaking their private photos, constantly sending death threats. But I feel like they are going to be getting a face no matter what after this election. Might as well hit them head on. Someone needs to.

I do find it interesting how they always talk about how weak the world is when they are obsessed with protecting their own fragile manliness, the average person always ranting about cuckolding and betas. Always talking about how down men are compared to everyone else. It really is quite pathetic. I'd love to be wrong but the numbers seem to constantly be growing among young men. I wonder what they are really insecure about?

[RihsusChrist(ATG)]

Just watched Megyn Kelly's show on FOX News and her interview with Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. Assange said he has more emails from Hillary Clinton, and DNC officials he is going to release at the "appropriate" time.

One of Megyn Kelly's pundits "Dana Perino" said Assange should wait to release the potentially damaging info on the eve of the 3rd Presidential Debate because the 3rd debate is the one most voters watch.

There ^ could be the "October Surprise" for Hillary.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Julian should do half before the 1st debate, and the other half b4 the 3rd. And maybe save some for a week before the election.

[Reza]

Mess at anyone being scared of that loser Assange. Half of the time he spends bashing Hillary and half of the time talking about how he is a victim. Yall need to log off and stop worrying so much

[Temporal]

Ngl Assange has me SHOOK.

[Skywalker]

I'm really not worried about him.

[LuLuDrops]

Julian has his own scandals to worry about, ha focus should be on getting out of those pickles and not fawning over Hillary

[LuLuDrops]

Originally posted by Toxicity.

Yeah I have a few PRcan friends and they're all Democrats so that sounds right. As for Chicano voters I'd say most of them are also blue I don't think they're that stupid to not know where they came from.

Cubans, yep Republicans.

Most Chicanos are Democrats but there are also those who turn their back on their roots, that's why Trump managed to tap into the coconut vote and pick up some of them

[LuLuDrops]

Originally posted by Toxicity.

This guy had booths up at every Pride Chicago weekend

Mess

[Meh]

TBH I'm not sure what to expect from Assange. I remember when they "announced" more DNC leaks and it was just boring-ass voicemails. One or two might stick, but I expect them to be mostly ignored except for the people who are already seizing on her emails/Clinton Foundation.

[King Maxx]

I don't think there is anything big because if there were they could literally release it now and end her. Why wait a week or two before? So the media can talk nonstop about it?

At that point, however small or big, people will be decided after the debates and early voting would have already started in many important states. It would have to be something so big to where decided voters say "Okay nope. I'm voting Trump."

[that G.U.Y.]

He's bluffing

[4seldemari]

Originally posted by King Maxx

No one else will say it so let me. Republicans and Trump supporters are stupid worthless peasants to society, and you if support those conspiracy theories and bigot rhetoric, then you are a troubled soul.

There should be some sort of litmus test for voters to see if they know the FACTS. We've completely ran away from them ever since the Newt Gingrich Revolution of the 90s.