if my post was such a huge flamebait (which it wasn't trust me) then literally 80% of that thread should be warned
literally 5 other people posted similar comments to mine...
and since when is that considered a shade/drag/flamebait?
I'm not arguing for the sake of arguing, I genuinely don't get it.
If a person looks sick in my opinion, I'm no longer allowed to voice that opinion?
Was I implying I wish bad on Gaga or something?
and since when is that considered a shade/drag/flamebait?
I'm not arguing for the sake of arguing, I genuinely don't get it.
If a person looks sick in my opinion, I'm no longer allowed to voice that opinion?
Was I implying I wish bad on Gaga or something?
It's more insensitive than flamebait but either way, it was WP worthy. "She looks unhealthy" would've sufficed.
It's only a temporary thing. But buy ATRL+ anyway so you can enjoy the site NOW!
The ATRL+ promo is becoming a bit much. In my opinion, people will choose to buy it or not based on their own personal circumstances and opinions. This isn't a personal attack by the way, just a suggestion.
The ATRL+ promo is becoming a bit much. In my opinion, people will choose to buy it or not based on their own personal circumstances and opinions. This isn't a personal attack by the way, just a suggestion.
I'll stop
Quote:
Originally posted by Kworb
600 users online, there would be no problems if we had such low traffic.
Why did I get 2 WP's for "deleting flamebait posts"? What a bunch of BS especially since none of my deleted posts were reported which says a lot since I literally have members stalking me (chris1991 polluting my wall by asking me how many WP's I have LOL desperate) to report anything, so my deleted posts weren't even that bad. I'd like to know which mod did this.