[BlueTimberwolf]

Plus the FBI had these emails (even though Hilary did her best to hide them from the public) and asked the justice dept to look into this, and Loretta Lynch refused. She needs to explain why since it is in the public interest.

[King Maxx]

I do not for the life of me get how someone can be mad that a horrible human rights country discredits Hillary and Bill when they actually used the money for good reasons. Don't all the pop girls we adore on here take millions from racists, sexists, and homophobic people AND KEEP IT FOR THEMSELVES???
===
Anyways early voting in Iowa and Minnesota starts in one month. It's time for Trump to get it together. If he has a bad September, which I suspect after the 1st debate, he's finished. No Iowa to win. And it's looking bad already because he doesn't have a big ground game there and isn't running ads.

[Sirnight]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Clinton is lucky she is up against Trump, b/c this would've sunk her campaign. We now have straight up proof of her giving special access to foundation donors, even foreign ones. Add that with her giving donors positions they weren't qualified for, and the fact that Huma Abedin worked for the govt and the foundation at the same time (even after Clinton's ethics agreement), I don't how anyone can be against the government looking into this.

If she were against someone else this story wouldn't have been blown up out of proportions to "balance" with the other side's scandals as they wouldn't have half as many as Trump does.

[lightstheyblindme]

Originally posted by Nialler

This will do no harm to her. After all she took money from ME countries which violate women rights and the media let her get away with it. Not to mention all the gays who support her.

girl you need to let go of this hate-boner you have for Hillary Clinton

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Clinton is lucky she is up against Trump, b/c this would've sunk her campaign. We now have straight up proof of her giving special access to foundation donors, even foreign ones. Add that with her giving donors positions they weren't qualified for, and the fact that Huma Abedin worked for the govt and the foundation at the same time (even after Clinton's ethics agreement), I don't how anyone can be against the government looking into this.

There's no proof. The optics look bad, sure, but lines are muddled. There's no actual proof of pay for play with the government and Clinton's Foundation.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by Sirnight

If she were against someone else this story wouldn't have been blown up out of proportions to "balance" with the other side's scandals as they wouldn't have half as many as Trump does.

I disagree, if anything it's getting even less coverage than it would have. And it's rightfully getting a lot of coverage, this is important. More important than Trump's twitter fights in my opinion.

[Troye]

Originally posted by King Maxx

I do not for the life of me get how someone can be mad that a horrible human rights country discredits Hillary and Bill when they actually used the money for good reasons. Don't all the pop girls we adore on here take millions from racists, sexists, and homophobic people AND KEEP IT FOR THEMSELVES???
===
Anyways early voting in Iowa and Minnesota starts in one month. It's time for Trump to get it together. If he has a bad September, which I suspect after the 1st debate, he's finished. No Iowa to win. And it's looking bad already because he doesn't have a big ground game there and isn't running ads.

I wish Arizona had early voting that far ahead so I can clinch this election for ha.

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by RatedG²

There's no proof. The optics look bad, sure, but lines are muddled. There's no actual proof of pay for play with the government and Clinton's Foundation.

What is proof to you? Because it's clearly in writing that donors were granted special access through Huma

[King Maxx]

Oh Maine, Illinois, NJ, and Vermont votes in Sept. and so does Virginia via absentee if you have an excuse.

[Mike91]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

Clinton is lucky she is up against Trump, b/c this would've sunk her campaign. We now have straight up proof of her giving special access to foundation donors, even foreign ones. Add that with her giving donors positions they weren't qualified for, and the fact that Huma Abedin worked for the govt and the foundation at the same time (even after Clinton's ethics agreement), I don't how anyone can be against the government looking into this.

I've said it a million times before and I'll keep saying it, but she needs to not run for re-election in 4 years. This will all come back to bite her eventually.

She should have never been the nominee to begin with (I'm not sure if Bernie should have either). It's been known for awhile that the Clinton Foundation has some shady dealings. It's just it was all conveniently kept quiet during the primaries.

[King Maxx]

I will say it again and again. These scandals won't hurt her especially if she has a great 1st term.

Hillary would still win based on demographics. She's hated by Republicans and Independents, but she has the support of most Democrats and enough Independents to win. People are so over her "scandals" at this point. All it takes is good economic growth and this election will be forgotten. People tend to forget how much Bill was hated when he 1st ran. He and Hillary changed the narrative because at the end of the day, the reliable voters care about the issues and not who's getting X,Y, and Z favor and who did or not tell her to set up a petty email server.

If Hillary could beat Bernie and Trump in the same year, she could take on this next person. There is not evidence yet to suggest the GOP will get its act together in 2020.

[Sirnight]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

What is proof to you? Because it's clearly in writing that donors were granted special access through Huma

It's said that 55% of non government were donors to the CF, but it doesn't even account for the people she could have met outside of then being donors to the CF and what was actually done after meeting (if there was actually any, as Huma shut a lot of them off). It's only a bad look because people are assuming the worse out of it. But nothing proved.

[King Maxx]

If Hillary does get immigration reform passed, equal pay and equal rights for LGBT passed, and successfully takes on the gun lobby. You better be sure the GOP will threaten the progress and Hillary will again be the "lesser of two evils" if not the "great POTUS we still need" like she currently is to 40-50% of the country is thinking right now. History has shown that incumbents with a good economy and foreign policy will get reelected.

Irangate and Monica scandal didn't hurt Reagan/Bush and Bill. Iraq didn't hurt Bush Jr. Benghazi didn't hurt Obama.

[Reza]

Originally posted by Mike91

I've said it a million times before and I'll keep saying it, but she needs to not run for re-election in 4 years. This will all come back to bite her eventually.

She should have never been the nominee to begin with (I'm not sure if Bernie should have either). It's been known for awhile that the Clinton Foundation has some shady dealings. It's just it was all conveniently kept quiet during the primaries.

its offensive how people are painting the clinton foundation as some type of money laundering scheme. It has helped get life saving medical treatments to people in many countries. Without it many people would have died. People want to get it shut down for political reasons and make some stupid statement which means that many people could go without treatment and die.

[King Maxx]

What happened to Goldman Sachs? Do people still talk about Benghazi? I barely heard about the emails until the recent events. America has short-term memory, and it's the reason we've gotten all of these bad POTUSes and nominees over the last several decades.

I don't think Trump or Hillary has changed the course of America. We'll still cling on the same people we always do. It's in our DNA. The GOP will vote another crazy tea party candidate again 2020. And Democrats will once again vote in an establishment.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by BlueTimberwolf

What is proof to you? Because it's clearly in writing that donors were granted special access through Huma

But there's no proof that they were given special privileges BECAUSE of their donations. It's all speculation

[BlueTimberwolf]

Originally posted by RatedG²

But there's no proof that they were given special privileges BECAUSE of their donations. It's all speculation

They were specifically referred to as friends of the foundation in the requests for access.

[BlueTimberwolf]

The best way to cover up bad behavior is with good behavior.

[Temporal]

Is there a reason why Clinton isn't hitting back at Trump even half as hard as he's hitting her? She's been largely silent on too many issues being brought up by the right, specifically accusations of corruption against the Clinton foundation. I'm a bit lost as to why her team is letting her get hammered on this issue and not push back with what the Clinton Foundation does and has accomplished.

[idkher]

At anyone thinking the faux outrage over the emails/foundation will last beyond her first 100 days let alone to 2020