Then why aren't they happy when they get into a war-freezone place in the first place but that's not good enough for them for some reason? That's the thing they are not happy .. it's odd.
Syrians have 3 major choices in their minds:
1. live in a warzone
2. move to an enormous overcrowded, bug infesed refugee camp in Turkey, Lebanon or Jordan
3. attempt to make a new life for themselves in a country which will allow them to do so, i.e western Europe.
If damn migrants reject your country offering them asylum and say it's too poor, then they want Germany you have the damn right to feel insulted. Eastern Europe has no obligation to the ungrateful.
The real refugees who need help are scattered in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, if you want to help the very poorest help their host country and do not invite migrants in.
and the reasoning why they think they have the right to step on hungarys ground is?? seriously these people need to ****ing go where they came from and keep on destroying their own countries. hungarys closed boarders are legal and they dont ****ing owe these immigrants anything
Some people here will defend them.
Since it's ok throwing stones and they're defending themselves.. stones don't kill.
So what you're saying is that they entered legally and are working?
Many of them moved here pre-2003 illegally, now they're legal and have integrated well into our culture.
Obviously the ones who came before 2003 can speak fluent English now.
I think its wrong and hypocritical of that eastern European politician to say these migrants won't work, because most of them will, if given the chance.
Syrians have 3 major choices in their minds:
1. live in a warzone
2. move to an enormous overcrowded, bug infesed refugee camp in Turkey, Lebanon or Jordan
3. attempt to make a new life for themselves in a country which will allow them to do so, i.e western Europe.
I know which one I'd choose.
Sorry but after living in a warzone I think you'd be grateful to live in a refugee camp which supplies food and water.
Yet there are some rejecting food and water and demanding money?
Many of them moved here pre-2003 illegally, now they're legal and have integrated well into our culture.
Obviously the ones who came before 2003 can speak fluent English now.
I think its wrong and hypocritical of that eastern European politician to say these migrants won't work, because most of them will, if given the chance.
I think the problem is that those refugees actually don't want Eastern Europe.
If damn migrants reject your country offering them asylum and say it's too poor, then they want Germany you have the damn right to feel insulted. Eastern Europe has no obligation to the ungrateful.
The real refugees who need help are scattered in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, if you want to help the very poorest help their host country and do not invite migrants in.
OF COURSE Syrian migrants are choosing western Europe over concentration camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, like wtf do you expect them to do? You think they'll be content living in those camps? accept that you will live in misery for many more years or take the illegal, expensive and dangerous route to Germany or the Nordics, its a no brainer.
I live in Ireland and a lot of my work colleagues are Poles, Slovaks and Hungarians and some of them can barely speak English, the irony.
What's your point? Even if they don't they got there LEGALLY. Those at the border crossing between Hungary and Serbia are illegal and not willing to cooperate . Why not? only the good lord knows coz if they were real Syrians they would be allowed to proceed to Germany after registering.
OF COURSE Syrian migrants are choosing western Europe over concentration camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, like wtf do you expect them to do? You think they'll be content living in those camps? accept that you will live in misery for many more years or take the illegal, expensive and dangerous route to Germany or the Nordics, its a no brainer.
I actually said that the poorest and neediest are in the concentration camps, and that they are stuck there. I'm talking about the ones already in Europe and rejecting their hosts who actually provided asylum.
OF COURSE Syrian migrants are choosing western Europe over concentration camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Turkey, like wtf do you expect them to do? You think they'll be content living in those camps? accept that you will live in misery for many more years or take the illegal, expensive and dangerous route to Germany or the Nordics, its a no brainer.
So you agree that those people want to improve their economic situation. Meanwhile a lot of people still suffer in the war-zone and we won't help them because we will waste our means and resources on those economic migrants who are already safe. That's not fair.
So you agree that those people want to improve their economic situation. Meanwhile a lot of people still suffer in the war-zone and we won't help them because we will waste our means and resources on those economic migrants who are already safe. That's not fair.
So you agree that those people want to improve their economic situation. Meanwhile a lot of people still suffer in the war-zone and we won't help them because we will waste our means and resources on those economic migrants who are already safe. That's not fair.
Thank you!
We won't kick out the refugees (25% of our population) but it is a huge burden on the economy, and education is very difficult to present to the Lebanese let along the Syrians.
We just need some help here, the poorest and neediest weren't able to escape to sea and are now living in here, Jordan and Turkey, this is a humanitarian crisis and instead of destabilizing the whole EU with culture clash we can use some help in here.
Cameron sees it, now the rest of the world should
If they are really refugees (wanting to escape to a safe country), why are they now crossing minefields in Croatia and risking their lives if Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia were already safe for them?
If they are really refugees (wanting to escape to a safe country), why are they now crossing minefields in Croatia and risking their lives if Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia were already safe for them?
Because they have a weird sense of entitlement over the social benefits.
If they are really refugees (wanting to escape to a safe country), why are they now crossing minefields in Croatia and risking their lives if Turkey, Macedonia and Serbia were already safe for them?
Pretty sure they're taking them to Zagreb with buses?
