[TayGod]

Originally posted by revel8

You previously claimed to 'know' that Taylor was not genuine, based on no first hand evidence whatsoever. Like I said before if you choose to ignore the mountain of testimony in favour of wishful thinking then that makes you irrational and a joke. You clearly demonstrate your lack of critical thinking in your postings in this forum.

Taylor indeed did get to the top by being nice. That is the key to her success. The fact that you claim otherwise is further proof of your disconnect with reality.

Also claiming that many others on this site agree with you is hardly a cause for celebration. There are known haters on this site who attempt to discredit everything she achieves and who are clearly morons who are just jealous of her success. Having those lunatics agree with you is no badge of honour, I assure you.

If you accuse me of lacking rationality, I care not. You clearly do not understand the concept of rationality. You have proven yourself to be sorely lacking in judgement and previously arrogant enough to claim superior gifts of discernment to all those people who have met Taylor in person and speak to her genuineness. Also the concept of receipts are something you fail to grasp. Your claims are built on hot air and wishful thinking, and ignoring evidence. This ain't the kiddies table, where the easily impressed 10 years olds believe in BS without foundation.

I don't have to discredit you, your posts do that by themselves. You can spout your fantasy-based fairytales and call them obvious all you like. No offense, but I stick to an evidence based world-view, like rational adults do. Sorry.

There are places on the internet where people can post their fictional stories. Why not use those instead of clogging up this forum?

Now, this is what I call a very intelligent and well-rounded rational rebuke to the haters out there.
But remember that these haters can only be irrational because they can't find a rational explanation for Taylor's success, so they must create an irrational one. It is called an 'inferiority complex' in my books. For example, their agreeing with Miley on the Bad Blood video (which is actually quite a clean video compared to some hollywood movies). But, I bet you that some of these members agreeing with Miley, have watched movies with much more extreme violence and by doing so, in essence, are contradicting themselves for the sake of an irrational argument.

[Letícia L.]

Originally posted by TayGod

Now, this is what I call a very intelligent and well-rounded rational rebuke to the haters out there.
But remember that these haters can only be irrational because they can't find a rational explanation for Taylor's success, so they must create an irrational one. It is called an 'inferiority complex' in my books. For example, their agreeing with Miley on the Bad Blood video (which is actually quite a clean video compared to some hollywood movies). But, I bet you that some of these members agreeing with Miley, have watched movies with much more extreme violence and by doing so, in essence, are contradicting themselves for the sake of an irrational argument.

Oh, I bet they LOVE the "Bitch Better Have My Money" video

[alestevens]

Originally posted by taylor__fan

Wait, I love this
But I honestly don't think the dance fits her that well to do a full album like tthat, maybe one song

3 songs to kickstart the final fase of the european domination will be fine. Then im gonna need a midtempo love song featuring Bruno Mars and it will be one of my favorite albums already

By the way, today's venue:

[TayGod]

Originally posted by simmnfierzig

Coming for that #1 and #2 album on the Billboard 200

Has that ever happened before? I know The Beatles had 6 songs in the top 10 on Billboard top 100 at the same time, but has anyone ever had two albums chart in the #1 and #2 spot at the same time?

[fridayteenage]

Yes.

"Meet the Beatles!" went on to spend 11 weeks at No. 1, kicking off a frenzied year for the act atop the album chart. For 20 nonconsecutive weeks in 1964, the Beatles concurrently had the Nos. 1 and 2 titles on the chart.
Then, on May 2 and May 9, the act's second set for Capitol -- "The Beatles' Second Album" -- was No. 1 while "Meet the Beatles!" slid to No. 2.
Like "Meet the Beatles!," the soundtrack blocked yet another Beatles album from hitting the top: "Something New." The latter Capitol release claimed the No. 2 slot for nine consecutive weeks between Aug. 22 and Oct. 17.

Possibly others, but I assumed Beatles had to have done it.

[simmnfierzig]

Originally posted by TayGod

Has that ever happened before? I know The Beatles had 6 songs in the top 10 on Billboard top 100 at the same time, but has anyone ever had two albums chart in the #1 and #2 spot at the same time?

Surely hasn't happened in ages and obviously won't happen with TS6, yeah of the top of my head don't know anyone besides the Beatles who has done that.

[TayGod]

Originally posted by fridayteenage

Yes.

"Meet the Beatles!" went on to spend 11 weeks at No. 1, kicking off a frenzied year for the act atop the album chart. For 20 nonconsecutive weeks in 1964, the Beatles concurrently had the Nos. 1 and 2 titles on the chart.
Then, on May 2 and May 9, the act's second set for Capitol -- "The Beatles' Second Album" -- was No. 1 while "Meet the Beatles!" slid to No. 2.
Like "Meet the Beatles!," the soundtrack blocked yet another Beatles album from hitting the top: "Something New." The latter Capitol release claimed the No. 2 slot for nine consecutive weeks between Aug. 22 and Oct. 17.

Possibly others, but I assumed Beatles had to have done it.

Wow! I like the Beatles too! But I didn't know that, even though, I do believe it!

The only thing is that back in the day, Pop artists released albums more frequently than they do now (I think)! but anyway, that is still an accomplishment!

[RobynYoBank]

"Meet the Beatles!" went on to spend 11 weeks at No. 1, kicking off a frenzied year for the act atop the album chart. For 20 nonconsecutive weeks in 1964, the Beatles concurrently had the Nos. 1 and 2 titles on the chart.
Then, on May 2 and May 9, the act's second set for Capitol -- "The Beatles' Second Album" -- was No. 1 while "Meet the Beatles!" slid to No. 2.
Like "Meet the Beatles!," the soundtrack blocked yet another Beatles album from hitting the top: "Something New." The latter Capitol release claimed the No. 2 slot for nine consecutive weeks between Aug. 22 and Oct. 17.

Possibly others, but I assumed Beatles had to have done it.

Yes, The Beatles have done it many times:

February 29, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 3 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

March 7, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 3 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

March 14, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

March 21, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

March 28, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

April 4, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

April 11, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

April 18, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

April 25, 1964
1 1 MEET THE BEATLES-Beatles
2 2 Introducing The Beatles-Beatles

May 2, 1964
1 16 BEATLES SECOND ALBUM-Beatles
2 1 Meet The Beatles-Beatles

May 9, 1964
1 1 BEATLES SECOND ALBUM-Beatles
2 2 Meet The Beatles-Beatles

August 22, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 6 Something New-Beatles

August 29, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

September 5, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

September 12, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

September 19, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

September 26, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

October 3, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

October 10, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

October 17, 1964
1 1 A HARD DAY'S NIGHT-Beatles
2 2 Something New-Beatles

Also, The Monkees, a make-believe Beatles band that debuted in the 1960s has done it:

February 11, 1967
1 122 MORE OF THE MONKEES-The Monkees
2 1 The Monkees-The Monkees

February 18, 1967
1 1 MORE OF THE MONKEES-The Monkees
2 2 The Monkees-The Monkees

February 25, 1967
1 1 MORE OF THE MONKEES-The Monkees
2 2 The Monkees-The Monkees

[fridayteenage]

I would be happy with a 19 tea when 21's Grammys came around: 21 was #1 while 19 went 9-4-7-7.

[Achilles.]

Walking through the crowd ()



The village is aglow.

[Great Username]

Originally posted by kevinnyc

kevinnyc so deadly wants to cover VANITY FAIR, I do NOT mind wearing dress for it Post this when my wife is in the other room.

Edit: Believe me, not just I was jealous

Mess

[IBeMe]

guys I've officially moved Taylor from my low favs to my main girls fav on my sig. and for a good half hour I was struggling to keep her name in a similar size to the others. Taylor Nation was trying to make her name look bigger then all the other girls on my sig

[IBeMe]

Does anyone mishear her lyrics in All You Had Do To Was Stay?

in the end when she says "you ended it , you were all I wanted. but not like this!" all I hear is "you INDIAN, you were all I wanted, but not like this!"

[Great Username]

Originally posted by Meowster

All of this flawless taste though.

People always tell me that the lows of Red are some of the worst in Her discography but I can't find any that I outright dislike or bore. They are all pretty consistently high - some are just more high than others and some of the others are outright peaks within Her discography.

So true. Red doesn't have lows, people need to stop trying to make up excuses for why it isn't Her magnum opus.

[Dani97]

Originally posted by IBeMe

guys I've officially moved Taylor from my low favs to my main girls fav on my sig. and for a good half hour I was struggling to keep her name in a similar size to the others. Taylor Nation was trying to make her name look bigger then all the other girls on my sig

Lord ha power

[Achilles.]

Don't forget to vote for Sean "Oh my God, look at that face" and our Father Calvin in ATRL's 100 Sexiest Men Alive by Wednesday!

[fridayteenage]

I voted for Austin.

[Achilles.]

I need Out of the Woods to be a smash single so that She'll keep performing on future tours.

She could totally IKYWT it for the next tour

[Great Username]

Originally posted by BlueMoon77

Wtf happened to the girl that used to hold her fans hands while she was singing F&A?!

I'll always love Taylor, but this kind of bothers me...

And when She walked through the crowd with Her hands extended like She knew She was Christ incarnate.
And y'all say She began feeling Herself in the 1989 era, I mean.

[Achilles.]

Remember when you hit the brakes too soon?
I remember
(Ahh ah ah, aah ah ah)
Twenty stitches in the hospital room
I remember
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)
You started crying, I did too
I remember
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)
The sun came up I was looking you
I REMEMBER
(Ahh ah ah, aah ah ah)
Remember when you couldn't take the heat?
I remember
(Ahh ah ah, aah ah ah)
I walked out, said I'm setting you free
I remember
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)
The monsters turned out to be JUST TREES
I remember
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)
The sun came up you were looking at me
I REMEMBER
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)
OH I REMEMBER
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)
Oh, do you remember
(Aah ah ah, aah ah ah)

Are we out of the woods yet?
Are we out of the woods yet?
Are we out of the woods yet?
Are we out of the woods?
Are we in the clear yet?
Are we in the clear yet?
Are we in the clear yet?
In the clear yet? GOOD.