It's a song that fantasizes consensual sex in the back of a limousine
Her fantasy
She is not being forced
She is not being objectified
She receives pleasure from the pleasure she gives to her partner
This is literally a woman being in control of her body and comfortable in her skin
It does not at all go against feminism
You don't see that because you don't want to
You have also proven that you don't actually understand what feminism is
Feminism does not say women can't get naked
Feminism does not say women can't get naked for a man
Feminism does not say that if a woman has sex with a man she should not be submissive
Feminism says that if a woman decides she wants to let her husband blow her back out in the car, then she can because it''s
her choice
Also:
Quote:
Originally posted by Johnny Cash
You clearly didn't understand what I said. Im against a woman presenting herself as an object to a man and that's usually how she acts in a lot of her videos. Im all for women to take off their clothes and shake their ass but not in some submissive kind of way, its contradictory to her whole feminist image. Christina's feminism feels more natural and consistent to me.
|
Of course it does because she's your fave and you hardly understand feminism as it is
& I'm glad you brought that up because Christina has explored similar themes in her music
Let's dissect a bit, shall we?
--
Can't Hold Us Down
If you look back in history
It's a common double standard of society
The guy gets all the glory the more he can score
While the girl can do the same and yet you call her a *****
Still Dirrty
Why is a woman's sexuality
Always under so much scrutiny?
Why can't she do exactly as she please
Without being called a million things?
Nasty Naughty Boy
You've been a bad bad boy
I'm gonna take my time, so enjoy
There's no need to feel no shame
Relax and sip upon my champagne
'Cause I wanna give you a little taste
Of the sugar below my waist, you nasty boy
These are three of the first that came to mind
This is your own fave literally knocking down your argument like a row of dominoes
Feminism is not automatically assuming that if a woman is being sexual for a man, she's being objectified. She's not presenting herself as an object. She's presenting herself as a horny woman who wants to have sex with her husband. It's honestly not that complicated.
I doubt you'll take heed to anything I have to say, so I don't know why I'm wasting my time typing all of this, but the next time you decide to assume that Beyonce is objectifying herself (lol @ the very idea of that) simply because she's willingly being sexual for her man, you can turn to Christina Aguilera, book "Your Fave", chapter "Feminism," verse "Bitch, you
tried it".
