Quote:
Originally posted by J a y
Helen is really deserving of the title, she was the most entertaining housemate of the entire series.
Why people continue to be emotionally invested in a game show, for everyone's entertainment, makes no sense to me.
You want who you like to win? Not the housemate that made watching Big Brother every night worth while? 
|
I agree that she was one of the most entertaining housemates of the series, and I'm kind of glad she got that final pass for entertainment value. She should NEVER have won, though.
The whole series was basically 'The Helen Show' anyways, Channel 5 could have given her as much attention and fame as she wanted when she came out of the house because she was the biggest talking point of the Summer and there was a lot of buzz around her - both good and bad. Heck, she could still get her own reality show (which she wanted) even if she didn't win! Making her the WINNER was a bit too much though, and constantly chopping and changing things related to the show in favor of AND AGAINST certain housemates is totally wrong.
Helen's win goes against EVERYTHING that Big Brother is, or what Big Brother SHOULD BE, in this case. Her immunity pass also ties in with this. But I guess what's done is done, Channel 5 and Big Brother has to pay for it now though. Just take a quick glance on Twitter or various other online platforms to see that most BB viewers are absolutely appalled with last nights result.
What I'm trying to say is that even if she didn't win, she'd probably still go on to do bigger things than anyone else in the house would - she'd probably do more than the person who was to win the show (really should've been Ashlord), that way it would be a win win situation for everyone! Totally undeserving winner. I'm ashamed for Channel 5 tbh. At least their CBB shows are usually better so we have that to look forward to.