Yes. Do you think every building surrounding the twin towers was going to go undamaged??
Do you know how many other buildings collapsed or was damaged??
Many buildings surrounding the towers were damaged or destroyed for obvious reasons. But Tower 7 is a different story. A normal building fire wouldn't burn hot enough to melt steel and cause the building to collapse in itself. Am I making any sense? The towers didn't fall outward, and that's the issue. Had the base been weakened due to a plane crashing into it (though, the top third of the building being hit would never cause the entire building to collapse like it did), it would have tipped over and fell. The buildings fell as if there was a controlled demolition taking place.
I wholeheartedly believe that the government was in on the whole thing. There's no way in hell those towers collapsed due to planes hitting the upper levels. It's been proven many times that thermite was present in the towers, and the "terrorists" surely couldn't have brought such high levels on board. People who work in controlled demolition have also stated that, had the towers fallen due to the planes hitting them, the would have tipped over; whereas the towers ended up falling inward, like a controlled demolition. Also, many witnesses outside of the Pentagon saw a military-type aircraft (like a missile or fighter jet; depending on who it is) right before the building was hit, not a commercial airplane. There are just too many "coincidences". The government NEEDED that war, and they were going to get everybody else on board with the idea somehow.
Anyway, I understand that most people choose to believe that the United States government is innocent, and that's fine. But I'd recommend checking out some of the legitimate 9/11 inside job/conspiracy theory videos if you're ever bored. You might learn a thing or two.
Have you watched any documentaries in regards to this??
If you had, you wouldnt have wasted your time writing this comment.
A ****ing airplane crash into the building. Do you know how much a airplane weigh?? Do you really think a building could sustain the weight of a airplane??
Quote:
Originally posted by IWasHere
Yes. Do you think every building surrounding the twin towers was going to go undamaged??
Do you know how many other buildings collapsed or was damaged??
Stop lying. Your above post proves that you didn't. The airplane didn't hit Tower 7, so why would it have to sustain the weight of an airplane that crashed hundreds of meters above on a completely different tower. The government said that fires destroyed Building 7, they didn't even try to say that the impact of an airplane would destroy another building that far away. If the government isn't even supporting your claims, then who is?
Quote:
In over 100 years of experience with steel frame buildings, fires have never caused the collapse of a single one, even though many were ravaged by severe fires. Indeed, fires have never caused the total collapse of any permanent steel structure.
It would be the largest and most mysterious structural failure in history.* The structural steel should have been painstakingly documented on site, then moved to warehouses for further study.
The team who investigated the collapse were not allowed access to the crime scene. By the time they published their inconclusive report, the evidence had been destroyed.
What would be the point of controlled demolition though?
None of us know the real reason for the 9/11 attacks if they were, in fact, an inside job. But the theory is that a major U.S. building (several, actually) was targeted and taken down, which led to the war that the government wanted. There's no way in hell the war would have received so much support had the 9/11 attacks never happened.
Have you watched any documentaries in regards to this??
If you had, you wouldnt have wasted your time writing this comment.
Yes, dozens. But I don't care for most of the ones on television that the government approves of. I watch the ones with experts testifying about the facts, the evidence, the truth. I don't know why you're so adamant about the government being completely innocent. They had millions of reasons to cause the attacks, and it's very unfortunate that thousands of innocent people died because of it.
My reasons have nothing to do with religion...
but everything to do with the unborn child and the woman and man's decision to get together and do something they knew might result and automatically just killing off a living being because
"They're not ready"
or whatever other LAME excuse they come up with...
Self people who have abortions done
once those two cells come together... a new life has begun.
so ur arguing not so much the religious aspect but the actual morals and ethics behind the action. and i understand that but i still think that people should make that moral decision on their own. plus if it is made illegal that could cause a lot of health issues from black market abortion alternatives.
None of us know the real reason for the 9/11 attacks if they were, in fact, an inside job. But the theory is that a major U.S. building (several, actually) was targeted and taken down, which led to the war that the government wanted. There's no way in hell the war would have received so much support had the 9/11 attacks never happened.
But wouldn't the news of terrorists highjacking planes and crashing them into buildings be scary enough? Why would the government feel the need to make sure the entire building comes down?
Stop lying. Your above post proves that you didn't. The airplane didn't hit Tower 7, so why would it have to sustain the weight of an airplane that crashed hundreds of meters above on a completely different tower. The government said that fires destroyed Building 7, they didn't even try to say that the impact of an airplane would destroy another building that far away. If the government isn't even supporting your claims, then who is?
so ur arguing not so much the religious aspect but the actual morals and ethics behind the action. and i understand that but i still think that people should make that moral decision on their own. plus if it is made illegal that could cause a lot of health issues from black market abortion alternatives.
this topic is over if you wanna discuss this with me further pm me
9/11 was an inside job. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just blind.
Furthermore, the whole incident insults human intelligence:
The hijackers got weapons past the security checkpoint at the airport.
A boeing jet knocked down a 110 story skyscraper. (GERL...)....yet there are skyscrapers in California and Japan that can withstand earthquakes, where the actual foundation shakes which can cause the building to fall.
Jet fuel isn't hot enough to melt steel. So the fire did NOT cause the building to fall.
Each tower collapsed into itself, PERFECTLY, the same way [intentionally] demolished buildings do.
The Pentagon is so called the building with the most security cameras, yet there's no video of the plane crashing into the building (spare me that low quality video that was released).
There was no plane wreckage found. A whole 747 just went missing. CHILE BYE.
The security camera from the Marriott adjacent to the Pentagon was seized.
As someone who lives in DC, there are A LOT of buildings in the area that SHOULD have video of the plane crashing into the Pentagon. Yet none exist.
The Pentagon is right next to the freeway, yet there haven't been any stories (to my knowledge) of people who were driving on the freeway who saw the plane crash into the Pentagon.
There was a Twin Towers bombing in 1993.
We suddenly need to declare war on the same people who threatened the in illo tempore's father years prior.
You guys need to see this as well. It's odd that so many 9/11 witnesses began mysteriously dying from suicide and "accidents". Especially that Deborah Palfrey, who announced shortly before her death that if she died in the near future, it would NOT be a suicide, and she was not suicidal at all. Guess what her cause of death was...
I wholeheartedly believe that the government was in on the whole thing. There's no way in hell those towers collapsed due to planes hitting the upper levels. It's been proven many times that thermite was present in the towers, and the "terrorists" surely couldn't have brought such high levels on board. People who work in controlled demolition have also stated that, had the towers fallen due to the planes hitting them, the would have tipped over; whereas the towers ended up falling inward, like a controlled demolition. Also, many witnesses outside of the Pentagon saw a military-type aircraft (like a missile or fighter jet; depending on who it is) right before the building was hit, not a commercial airplane. There are just too many "coincidences". The government NEEDED that war, and they were going to get everybody else on board with the idea somehow.
Anyway, I understand that most people choose to believe that the United States government is innocent, and that's fine. But I'd recommend checking out some of the legitimate 9/11 inside job/conspiracy theory videos if you're ever bored. You might learn a thing or two.
Yes, dozens. But I don't care for most of the ones on television that the government approves of. I watch the ones with experts testifying about the facts, the evidence, the truth. I don't know why you're so adamant about the government being completely innocent. They had millions of reasons to cause the attacks, and it's very unfortunate that thousands of innocent people died because of it.
There were experts testifying in the televised documentaries also.
And what are the millons of reason for the government to caused the attacks??
You guys need to see this as well. It's odd that so many 9/11 witnesses began mysteriously dying from suicide and "accidents". Especially that Deborah Palfrey, who announced shortly before her death that if she died in the near future, it would NOT be a suicide, and she was not suicidal at all. Guess what her cause of death was...
These videos are going to give me nightmares tonight.
There were experts testifying in the televised documentaries also.
And what are the millons of reason for the government to caused the attacks??
How about to enter the current war that the U.S. is still involved in today?
Terrorism and WOMD were big fronts that the government immediately started preaching to the public right after the attacks on the World Trade Center. What happened to these supposed WOMD? They didn't exist.
But wouldn't the news of terrorists highjacking planes and crashing them into buildings be scary enough? Why would the government feel the need to make sure the entire building comes down?
Because terrorists crashing planes into buildings wouldn't be enough to convince Americans to go to war. They needed the buildings to be decimated. And they also needed all of those casualties.
Quote:
Originally posted by Lately 1814
9/11 was an inside job. Anyone who thinks otherwise is just blind.
Furthermore, the whole incident insults human intelligence:
The hijackers got weapons past the security checkpoint at the airport.
A boeing jet knocked down a 110 story skyscraper. (GERL...)....yet there are skyscrapers in California and Japan that can withstand earthquakes, where the actual foundation shakes which can cause the building to fall.
Jet fuel isn't hot enough to melt steel. So the fire did NOT cause the building to fall.
Each tower collapsed into itself, PERFECTLY, the same way [intentionally] demolished buildings do.
The Pentagon is so called the building with the most security cameras, yet there's no video of the plane crashing into the building (spare me that low quality video that was released).
The security camera from the Marriott adjacent to the Pentagon was seized.
As someone who lives in DC, there are A LOT of buildings in the area that SHOULD have video of the plane crashing into the Pentagon. Yet none exist.
The Pentagon is right next to the freeway, yet there haven't been any stories (to my knowledge) of people who were driving on the freeway who saw the plane crash into the Pentagon.
There was a Twin Towers bombing in 1993.
We suddenly need to declare war on the same people who threatened the in illo tempore's father years prior.
Chile bye.
THANK YOU.
I find it odd that the government hides so many official documents, photos and video footage when they claim to have nothing to hide. It wouldn't be appropriate to released everything, but there is still no hard evidence that things happened the way that they claim.
I love how the 9/11 Commission was conveniently started 14 months after the attacks, which caused vital information to be lost.
The only two high rise buildings to ever collapse because of a fire are the Twin Towers.
Tower 7, where documents with information about a lot of people on Wall St. were, conveniently fell.
A month or so before the towers were hit, the owner of the buildings took out an insurance policy for over a billion dollars.
The towers collapsed even though there were built to withstand several airplane impacts.
The only plane that didn't get to its destination was the one headed towards the White House. How convenient.
The plane that crashed into a field basically disappeared into thin air.
The plane that crashed into the Pentagon left a hole smaller than that of a plane.
These things are just too much proof for me.
The only thing I can't explain is what happened to the people on the planes. Did the gov't take them somewhere and kill them?
Like I said before apparently the passengers of Flight 93 were flown to some government base where they were shot and killed.
* This is from some theory I read.
Do you think every building surrounding the twin towers was going to go undamaged??
i feel so loved
