Quote:
Originally posted by P_Cahleb_M
why would a major label give a NEW artist a 6 album contract? That's stupid. Labels don't do that because there is a chance they might flop. Her first contract involved
...Baby One More Time
Oops!... I Did It Again
Britney
|
Who said she was given a full contract for 6 albums when she was a nobody? NONE.
And 3 albums that binds a "nobody" on the initial meeting is f*cking illogical. Your theory is just implausible, Im sorry.
Quote:
Originally posted by P_Cahleb_M
she resigned for another four albums as long as she had a say in her career.
In The Zone
Blackout
Circus
Seventh Album
in between these album releases we saw three albums that did not count on as an album. Two of these albums only had 1 new song each while one had 3 new songs. Brits contracts are different from other artists contracts
|
But the legal clauses of a notarized contract meet on the same crossroads. Greatest Hits compilations are counted on the contractual obligations of any artists signed. They dont just churn out of the blue.
Shakira is obliged to fulfill her contract before leaving EPIC which "ultimately" includes a new studio LP and a Greatest Hits
ALBUM. Likewise, Madonna with Celebration before moving to Live Nation. Moreover, calling the GH CDs as "Greatest Hits
ALBUM" have been used for ages, so I dont get why you keep on denying its exclusivity to the paper arrangements.
You didnt have any backbones to support your claims. I asked how come you know all of this and you responded with "I Stan For Britney", now how delusional and irresponsible was that?
See, I doubt if anyone out here knew certainly about Britney's career developments, in terms of written agreements between her and Jive but I know she signed that ****ing deal BEFORE Blackout came out! Did I not bring you an another witness? If you can do the same, then we'll have a Starbucks.