Is Katy a great singer?
Does she dance?
Is she able to write smart/witty pop songs that are both radio-friendly and thought provoking?
Is she controversial?
Your so pathetic & predictable. Why are you so angry and obsessed with Katy all the damn time? Are you mad that Gaga hasn't been acknowledged as a pop star since 2011? I mean, her team bought her a Golden Globe for her atrocious acting, so you guys should be the last ones talking about buying the press for a "comeback". Unlike your fave, Katy is gonna have a successful comeback because people are actually interested her. Why? She's not a fad. She nor her team don't need to buy anything, streams & sales speak for themselves. She sells millions & will continue to sell millions & win multiple awards, Grammys aren't the only awards idiot, so you can sit your loose banged up stretched ass down & remain pressed.
Everytime theres a positive article like this about Gags its people such as yourself that claim the article was probably just written by a stan and sometimes thats honestly correct. Because publications do have people just like us that enjoy/obsess over these artists like we do. You have Rob Sheffield at Rolling Stone that stans for Britney and writes all those puff pieces about her calling Blackout influential which is the referenced article everyone uses when defending such a statement. You have people at Billboard and V that stan for Gaga and therefore you see a lot of positive articles about her there, etc etc. And just about every publication has Beyhive in there amping up everything she does from walking down the street to her music.
Im not saying articles like this are irrelevant. But I think we as a forum take such things way too seriously. Because in all honesty, whether they be simply staffwriters or actual respected journalists, its just one human beings opinion except with a platform to express it. It doesnt always make their point of view correct or better just because they work for a publication.
the excuses this removes credibility how? it's still under Time.
I guess if I'd work for TIME and get my article about Katy being one of the worst performers alive posted by them , it means that it's a fact ? that's based on the logic you used in your comment
I guess if I'd work for TIME and get my article about Katy being one of the worst performers alive posted by them , it means that it's a fact ? that's based on the logic you used in your comment
it's not a fact, but it's a fact that TIME said it
Your so pathetic & predictable. Why are you so angry and obsessed with Katy all the damn time? Are you mad that Gaga hasn't been acknowledged as a pop star since 2011? I mean, her team bought her a Golden Globe for her atrocious acting, so you guys should be the last ones talking about buying the press for a "comeback". Unlike your fave, Katy is gonna have a successful comeback because people are actually interested her. Why? She's not a fad. She nor her team don't need to buy anything, streams & sales speak for themselves. She sells millions & will continue to sell millions & win multiple awards, Grammys aren't the only awards idiot, so you can sit your loose banged up stretched ass down & remain pressed.