[Duca]

Originally posted by ashuduff

How is HIAM even remotely uncommercial? Run The World is something somewhat uncommercial.

It mixes rave chords, dubstep (a new sound she introduced to the mainstream audience,) industrial beats, and trance synths. It sounds like nothing out right now and is far from the norm in terms of the typical dance-pop production. The only problem with “Hold It Against Me” was that it wasn’t catchy (like “Womanizer,” for example,) which probably caused it to fall out of favor once the hype settled.

“Run The World” was typical Beyoncé: female empowerment and an aggressive, hot beat.

[Willy.]

Originally posted by ashuduff

How is HIAM even remotely uncommercial? Run The World is something somewhat uncommercial.

Hold It Against Me was uncommercial, for radio at least.

Same goes with RTW.

[nky0411]

so theg gonna snub the queen of dance pop music?
every singles has topped the BB dance chart ezcept Judas ..

[JDM]

I love Rihanna but she did not deserve to win last year. Any of the other four songs would've been perfect.

[Dark Matter]

Capitol better ****ing submit Turn Me On or Titanium for the dance categories...

[WithBreezy]

Originally posted by Mtjjproducer

I like them but I don't think they deserve Grammys for best dance. 1998 to 2004 Britney did, But now she doesn't really dance well at all. And Lady Gaga's dancing skills are basic and Rihanna winning best dance…

Hell they should have at least nominated Ciara for Gimmie Dat or Ride (not sure if those were last Year) . because those had better dancing that of those other nominees.

[Willy.]

Originally posted by JDM

I love Rihanna but she did not deserve to win last year. Any of the other four songs would've been perfect.

DITD should have won.

But it also should've been a single.

[RichGirlPlanet]

Originally posted by Mtjjproducer

I like them but I don't think they deserve Grammys for best dance. 1998 to 2004 Britney did, But now she doesn't really dance well at all. And Lady Gaga's dancing skills are basic and Rihanna winning best dance…

Hell they should have at least nominated Ciara for Gimmie Dat or Ride (not sure if those were last Year) . because those had better dancing that of those other nominees.

Hold on...

[Doc]

Originally posted by Mtjjproducer

I like them but I don't think they deserve Grammys for best dance. 1998 to 2004 Britney did, But now she doesn't really dance well at all. And Lady Gaga's dancing skills are basic and Rihanna winning best dance…

Hell they should have at least nominated Ciara for Gimmie Dat or Ride (not sure if those were last Year) . because those had better dancing that of those other nominees.

WAIT.

This post needs more attention.

[BRITNEY LICIOUS]

Originally posted by Mtjjproducer

I like them but I don't think they deserve Grammys for best dance. 1998 to 2004 Britney did, But now she doesn't really dance well at all. And Lady Gaga's dancing skills are basic and Rihanna winning best dance…

Hell they should have at least nominated Ciara for Gimmie Dat or Ride (not sure if those were last Year) . because those had better dancing that of those other nominees.

[Sapphire]

Grammys do the right things

[LadyGagaStan93]

Meh... I guess people would have agreed with this a bit more if they explained it when they changed the categories around. Instead of waiting till the submissions were in. Oh well!

[Haunted.]

Seriously?

[satellites.™]

Originally posted by Duca

It mixes rave chords, dubstep (a new sound she introduced to the mainstream audience,) industrial beats, and trance synths. It sounds like nothing out right now and is far from the norm in terms of the typical dance-pop production. The only problem with “Hold It Against Me” was that it wasn’t catchy (like “Womanizer,” for example,) which probably caused it to fall out of favor once the hype settled.

“Run The World” was typical Beyoncé: female empowerment and an aggressive, hot beat.

Duca shutup, only you could say some **** like this and actually take yourself seriously.

[Lipton]

Originally posted by Mtjjproducer

I like them but I don't think they deserve Grammys for best dance. 1998 to 2004 Britney did, But now she doesn't really dance well at all. And Lady Gaga's dancing skills are basic and Rihanna winning best dance…

Hell they should have at least nominated Ciara for Gimmie Dat or Ride (not sure if those were last Year) . because those had better dancing that of those other nominees.

You and Jafet need to become friends.

[Comedor]

Beyonce remains unbothered.

[@michael]

I disagree with the ruling.

[satellites.™]

Originally posted by stevensaurusrex

I kinda like the idea, but "Dance" is a misleading term to begin with since it's "in" right now. They should change the name maybe?

I don't think so, I for one am so sick of these bitches we worship shifting their music so intensely to follow trends that the Grammys have to keep changing things. The same thing was happening in R&B in the 00's, the sound became more mixed with pop so they added Contemporary R&B, which I believe has ben knocked back to R&B as of this year. The Grammys are tired of mainstream acts trying to ride their way into every category, which ends up blocking those actual acts in the genre from winning. Dance is obviously meant for people like David Guetta and Robyn, it's basically an underground pop category. And while I understand people like Rihanna and Gaga make real deal dance music, they are pop stars, and they should either submit to pop or dance, not both.

[Duca]

Originally posted by satellites™

Duca shutup, only you could say some **** like this and actually take yourself seriously.

For once, the critics do agree with me.

[KitKat]

I thought it was weird. Huh :/