I'm glad she's not doing more press conferences. As these questions showed today, the only thing they are after is political drama, and she's better off sticking with the issues, and the last thing she needs is another petty scandal.
People who do not deem as trustworthy are not going to change their mind when she does hold a press conf, but will just stick to a few controversial answers to further their hatred. It'es a lose-lose situation for her.
She will have plenty of time to gain them over when she's effective while in office tho
the libs are ABSOLUTELY NOT the "far right." That's the Constitution Party.
Far Left - Green
Left & Center-Left - Democrats
Far left (social, foreign) & Far right (economics) - Libertarians
Center-Right & Right - Republicans
Far Right - Constitution
Don't get it twisted
What part of the Libertarian programme is far left on social issues and on foreign policy though? Supporting gay rights is merely centrist or centre-left nowadays. Way lower punishments, writing a law that states priests and churches cannot deny gay people a wedding in their place, delegalising gun use, legalising ecstacy and mushies, setting up hurdles of regulations on green policy and legalising euthanasia for all ages would be far-left social policy for the US.
Donating money for Israel to increase military spending in itself makes a party unable to be considered far left. Let's not have that discussion now though.
The only leftist on foreign policy this election is Trump actually. Not 100% supporting NATO is as leftist as it can get in the US.
It would've been SUPER cringeworthy if she would've tried to actually answer that messy question and it wouldn't have come off right. She did the right thing.
Nope, she bungled it. She couldn't answer the question outright, so she listed all 600 black people she knew and called them her "crew"
I've never seen anything like it, she's so socially awkward lol.
Nope, she bungled it. She couldn't answer the question outright, so she listed all 600 black people she knew and called them her "crew"
I've never seen anything like it, she's so socially awkward lol.
You've repeatedly said it was awkward throughout this page but I fail to see how it is.
Singling out a single encounter as "the most meaningful" is ridiculous. There is far more potential for unintentional implications that are best avoided.
Hillary was quick enough to avoid that hot mess of a trap question and just went for the safe bet in dodging the need to provide a single encounter by demonstrating that she believes all her encounters are meaningful. It's cheesy but it's politically savvy.
The part where she talks about building a border is literally blatantly taken out of context She was talking about supporting a fence, something bernie supported as well. Trump speaks of building a gigantic Great Wall Of China esque barrier all paid for by Mexico's government.
The video is literally just cutting a splicing portions of what she said to fit their agenda and it's disgusting
Found a long post, sarcastic tone , but it shows that the more that's known about Jill's VP pick and his past comments the more I bet the Green Party leaders are like "Mmm..." He can't stand Bernie like I said before, as far back as 2015 he viciously attacked him and then came for the supporters as he gained traction - I wonder how much Jill knew. In bold are Ajamu's own words.
Quote:
Some terrific news for die-hard Bernie-or-bust folks who simply can’t bring themselves to vote for that warmonger Hillary Clinton, and are instead supporting the genuine leftist alternative, Green Party candidate Jill Stein: Stein this week announced that her running mate would be human rights activist Ajamu Baraka, who is so very left that he considers Bernie Sanders an imperialist tool and a borderline racist.
As for Bernie Sanders and his supporters, Baraka only mentions them a few times in his blog, mostly as sadly disappointing liberal squishes. Sanders gets a brief mention in an essay decrying Beyonce’s Super Bowl performance as a “commodified caricature of black opposition” in which “the imagery and symbols of authentic black radicalism [were] grotesquely transformed into a de-politicized spectacle by gyrating, light-skinned booty-short-clad sisters.” Baraka dismisses Sanders as a mere distraction from the real work of radically transforming the world:
"In this period of media-driven pseudo-opposition in the form of Ta-Nehisi Coates, Beyoncé or even Bernie Sanders, it is increasingly difficult to make the distinction between image and reality, especially when the production of images and symbols is controlled by dominant forces with an interest in keeping us all stupid."
In other pieces, Baraka implicates Bernie Sanders supporters in western indifference toward victims of our “allies” in the Middle East, especially in Saudi Arabia’s air raids supporting what’s left of the government of Yemen in its civil war against Houthi rebels (who are murderous bastards in their own right, too).
In short, said Baraka in the September 2015 piece, a President Bernie Sanders would simply be yet another imperialist warmonger who’d support “continued war crimes from the sky with drone strikes and Saudi led terror in support of the Western imperial project.” And his supporters are — at best — willfully blind to Sanders’s own racist warmongering:
"In their desperate attempt to defend Sanders and paint his critics as dogmatists and purists, the Sanders supporters have not only fallen into the ideological trap of a form of narrow “left” nativism, but also the white supremacist ethical contradiction that reinforces racist cynicism in which some lives are disposable for the greater good of the West.
And as much as the ‘Sandernistas’ attempt to disarticulate Sanders “progressive” domestic policies from his documented support for empire (even the Obamaite aphorism “The perfect is the enemy of the good” is unashamedly deployed), it should be obvious that his campaign is an ideological prop — albeit from a center/left position — of the logic and interests of the capitalist-imperialist settler state."
Trump seems to be obsessed with the thought of using nuclear weapons - even against Nato countries (US' closest allies like Germany, France, UK, Spain, Italy, Denmark etc).
Trump seems to be obsessed with the thought of using nuclear weapons - even against Nato countries (US' closest allies like Germany, France, UK, Spain, Italy, Denmark etc).
I honestly don't think he's aware of the damage a nuclear bomb can cause, that's the scariest thing. He probably thinks you can use a nuclear bomb to get rid of ISIS - not stopping to think that ISIS is not a country and they are spread throughout the world.
Why is she still trying to cover up her tracks prior to the FBI verdict she constantly said she only had one server and didn't send any classified information. The FBI verdict didn't indirectly said she lied but the FBI director did say she used multiple servers and sent classified information..
Now she is saying she has said that the whole time this is why folks don't trust her. She always flips flops. Just admit he was right and you was caught lying and move on
Nope, she bungled it. She couldn't answer the question outright, so she listed all 600 black people she knew and called them her "crew"
I've never seen anything like it, she's so socially awkward lol.
It's an ambitiously awkward question and she gave a general answer because she couldn't think of something off the top of her head.
As if Hillary, over the course of 60+ years of conversations, has determined which conversations were most meaningful by race.
Found a long post, sarcastic tone , but it shows that the more that's known about Jill's VP pick and his past comments the more I bet the Green Party leaders are like "Mmm..." He can't stand Bernie like I said before, as far back as 2015 he viciously attacked him and then came for the supporters as he gained traction - I wonder how much Jill knew. In bold are Ajamu's own words.
I feel sorry for anybody voting Jill's ticket tbh. Mostly motivated by anti-Hillary yet I doubt they understand much of the ticket they're going for. If I was that Anti-Hillary I wouldn't be voting this election at all.
Trump seems to be obsessed with the thought of using nuclear weapons - even against Nato countries (US' closest allies like Germany, France, UK, Spain, Italy, Denmark etc).
He's honestly terrifying
Like I don't care what people say about Hillary, but in the end she isn't gonna use nuclear ****ing weapons like Trump's cheeto ass.