Mike's blood was on the gun because he was shot in the hand from trying to take the gun
Maybe he was shot in the hand because they were in close quarters in the car, or as he was struggling with the officer? To say he was going for the gun is a stretch.
Mike's blood was on the gun because he was shot in the hand from trying to take the gun
How do you know he was trying to take the gun? How do you he just wasn't shot in the hand? You can shoot someone in the hand. It doesn't prove he was reaching for the gun. And if he was reaching for the gun, or hand his hand on the gun. How would he get shot in the hand if his hand was on the gun?
But I'm glad that the documents are released so I can provide receipts for why people are pissed off and can't just rely on Wilson's testimony.
Quote:
"I felt that another of those punches in my face could knock me out or worse ... I've already taken two to the face and I didn't think I would, the third one could be fatal if he hit me right," Wilson said.
Two punches barely leave any marks and you believe the third one was going to be fatal?
Why are you assuming the one people angry and looting are black? There are/were many whites and Hispanics taking part in the riots last night and back in the summer.
Apparently the medical examiner didn't take pictures of Mike Brown's body because he/she ran out of ****ing batteries? what a ****ing joke. why would you NOT take a spare when you knew what you were about to do?
Apparently the medical examiner didn't take pictures of Mike Brown's body because he/she ran out of ****ing batteries? what a ****ing joke. why would you NOT take a spare when you knew what you were about to do?
!!!!!!!!
Lets not even get into how his body was left in the middle of the road for FOUR HOURS They couldn't replace the batteries during that time to make sure you had pictures of the crime scene? Unless you didn't WANT pictures of the crime scene. And thats not even a reach or a conspiracy. But don't listen to me, I'm just a ignorant race-baiter.
Maybe he was shot in the hand because they were in close quarters in the car, or as he was struggling with the officer? To say he was going for the gun is a stretch.
Quote:
Originally posted by YouDaIcon
How do you know he was trying to take the gun? How do you he just wasn't shot in the hand? You can shoot someone in the hand. It doesn't prove he was reaching for the gun. And if he was reaching for the gun, or hand his hand on the gun. How would he get shot in the hand if his hand was on the gun?
There is autopsy evidence that the hand wound could have only been because of him having his hand over the gun, trying to grab it. Ya'll stay ignoring the facts.
There is autopsy evidence that the hand wound could have only been because of him having his hand over the gun, trying to grab it. Ya'll stay ignoring the facts.
They will never stop saying NONE despite all the evidence on the report.
Lets not even get into how his body was left in the middle of the road for FOUR HOURS They couldn't replace the batteries during that time to make sure you had pictures of the crime scene? Unless you didn't WANT pictures of the crime scene. And thats not even a reach or a conspiracy. But don't listen to me, I'm just a ignorant race-baiter.
There is autopsy evidence that the hand wound could have only been because of him having his hand over the gun, trying to grab it. Ya'll stay ignoring the facts.
Please link this evidence. That seems very specific.
Of the 2,695 black murder victims, 2,447 were committed by black offenders and only 193 by white offenders. Compare that to 3,172 white murder victims where 448 where black offenders.
Don't talk to me about how whitey is killing your youth.
There is autopsy evidence that the hand wound could have only been because of him having his hand over the gun, trying to grab it. Ya'll stay ignoring the facts.
I say again, WHERE is the source of this claim? I didn't ask for your interpretation of the autopsy evidence "facts", I asked for the source.
People aren't acting with their heads but with their emotions and all I'm trying to do is suggest what will help with progress. But of course everyone loves thinking they're a victim and that I'm supporting racism. **** no. I'm supporting the end of racism. Ferguson does not represent all black people. I'm speaking about Ferguson, no one else. But why the **** would they try to fight such an evil stereotype by living up to it??? They are giving people and cops more justification for their racism. When people look at Ferguson on tv they will think "Well maybe there is a truth to the black people are violent and dangerous stereotype because look at what they're doing on tv." and that's the consequence for Ferguson being ****ing stupid and causing this riot. All races have the potential to act this way especially if given the situational context of black people, that's not the point. The point is we can't fight a negative stereotype by performing that negative stereotype. Don't support Ferguson because they're making it hard for every black person who doesnt live up to the stereotype which is the majority.
!
How the **** is hitting people with rocks and trashing stores by innocent people gonna help anything? I am so ****ing sick of these thugs giving us a bad name UGH.