|
"Back To Basics" Chart Performance and Discussion
Member Since: 12/20/2006
Posts: 18,138
|
Quote:
Originally posted by R0KR of the R0Ks
Britneys thread has been about all of her failures at life. Christina's thread has been about lets see
1) Debuting #1 the first week in 15 countries. Aguilera's album reached number 1 in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, The Netherlands, Australia,Canada, Switzerland, Austria, Ireland, Welsh, Thailandia, Taiwan, Singapore, Philippine, Korea, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Dutch, Austria in the same week.
I <3 Christina. legend.
|
Aguilera's album reached number 1 in the United States,[8] United Kingdom,[9][10] Germany,[11] The Netherlands,[12] Australia,[13] Canada,[14] Switzerland,[15] Austria,[16] Ireland,[17] Welsh, Thailandia, Taiwan, Singapore, Philippine, Korea, Indonesia, Hong Kong, Dutch, Austria in the same week.----(from wikipedia )
you have a very good source
Quote:
Originally posted by R0KR of the R0Ks
2) 3 top 40 hits so far with Back to basics!
|
only one has its longetivity
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/5/2007
Posts: 7,024
|
I read in billboard that it was like 13 or 14 countries, suga you be wronngg.
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/20/2006
Posts: 18,138
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Mr. One & Only
I read in billboard that it was like 13 or 14 countries, suga you be wronngg.
|
im not the one who has wiki as a source
|
|
|
Member Since: 4/12/2007
Posts: 5,851
|
I'm not biased toward either Christina or Britney and I think it's wrong to argue that one of them is more talented than the other. On the whole though, Christina does make better, more innovative music. I thought "In the Zone" was a great cd and "Britney" had some strong tracks, but overall those cds had little on their mind. "Christina" was more solid than "BOMT", "Stripped" was uneven but had a lot of soul, and "Back to Basics" has a little too much filler--but overall, each of those cds were more enjoyable than Britney's. The thing about Britney is that her music has always been directed at young girls and young women. I think Christina's music has always appealed to people of all ages. I don't think Christina is any more talented than Britney, I like them both very much, but I think Christina challenges herself a bit more with her music than Britney does.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/5/2007
Posts: 7,024
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Suga
Britney Spears
Rank: 12
Net Worth (in $ millions): 100
Age: 25
Marital Status: married
Kids: 2
Source: music
In just a few short years, Spears went from an obscure teen actress on the Disney Channel's short-lived The New Mickey Mouse Club to one of the most successful pop singers in the world with her 1999 debut album, …Baby One More Time. During her brief career, she has sold 75 million records and enjoyed seven hit singles. Her tours have grossed $145 million to date. Spears took the last few years off, a period in which she married, had two children, then ultimately filed for divorce from backup dancer Kevin Federline--a series of events that helped earn her tabloid queen status. Word is Britney is back in the studio recording a comeback album.
|
what are the words i'm looking for -- are they 'good research'? maybe.. oh wait no they're GO AWAY.
|
|
|
Member Since: 6/16/2006
Posts: 12,884
|
Everyone knew that Suga. She hit #1 with B2B in like 15 countries. You are starting to turn into a Britney troll.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/5/2007
Posts: 7,024
|
yeah, you used to just be a troll that was acceptable.. now you're a britney troll... but at least Temptation and pedro are nice with it and like christina at least a little or respect her
|
|
|
Member Since: 12/23/2006
Posts: 20,355
|
it´s sad yet predictable that unnecessary bashing and stupid hating goes on here every time i log onto PF....today we christina fans have great news of her concerts in australia/NZ selling out within hours, and already adding second shows to all apart from 2 already...so much for the flop
you britney fans has had a great day to celebrate the return to stage of your idol, be happy with that!....it´s great for you, must feel amazing!
....yet it doesn´t seem enough for you, since it seems almost as important to hate christina whether she have success or not...making all those faces....too good that most unbiased ppl here find it being annoying and childish
...and lol @ someone´s saying "now i know why she´s called legentina, she has the records in most flops in a row"....that´s a desperate and not so solid fact lol, but he might have sources of which i´m unfamilliar to...
i´m gonna keep posting news and positive stuff here (like fans in the end ultimately should do) and just hope that this thread about christina and B2B and news related to that, will be kept adequately clean from now on...
like rico says, i´m done...thank you!
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/1/2007
Posts: 2,747
|
Go Christina AND Britney...
There now it's settled...now let's end it now
LOL @ this comment on Britney's last.fm
Quote:
lol look at the slaguilera fans getting defensive because one night of britney is more successful/talked about than the entire back to boring era and its three unsuccessful singles
|
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/17/2006
Posts: 6,429
|
I honestly dont think christina cares if britney is more talked about. They both are diffrent artist. I dont see why we have to choose between one of the other. Some like britney more becase she a dancer. Other like christina for her singing. Some people like both for diffrent reasons. People need to grow up and realize that this is not 1999 anymore. They both had their fair share of sucess
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/1/2007
Posts: 2,747
|
Quote:
Originally posted by johnrzeznikfan
I honestly dont think christina cares if britney is more talked about. They both are diffrent artist. I dont see why we have to choose between one of the other. Some like britney more becase she a dancer. Other like christina for her singing. Some people like both for diffrent reasons. People need to grow up and realize that this is not 1999 anymore. They both had their fair share of sucess
|
Finally someone has the mind of a GENIUS!
I'll be honest right here and all. I like both Christina and Britney for different reasons. Even though I am much more of a fan of Britney, but I think Christina is more talented. Look at my last.fm, Britney is my second listened artist, while Christina is 27 or so.
I honestly think Britney's music is more memorable then Christinas. It's more upbeat and it's one of those types where you can listen to it and just sing along to it, and even dance too. Christina is one of those artists where we know she has much more talent, vocal wise and even grammy wise, but nothing about her music is memorable. It's good and all, but 10 years from now, are we going to remember Candyman? Probably not, we'll for sure remember Toxic though.
Britney is more of an entertainer if anything. People look up to Britney because of that. Her music is not known to be good. Being a huge Britney fan, I can even 'admit' her music isn't like...outstanding or excellent. She has the type of music that just 'gets' to you on the inside whether it's being catchy, singing along, or just simply 'hearing' her unique voice.
Christina is vocally better, yes, I'll even admit that (being a Britney fan). Christina is more talented, yes, I'll even admit that. Christina is known for her outstanding vocal power that she gives to her fans.
Christina is Christina.
Britney is Britney.
Why can't we just end this now and move along? They both went in separate paths. One went down the wrong path, while the other did fine. But now they are both on track.
Remember this though, this battle between Britney and Christina all started because of their music. Music is music, and we all have different tastes. That is all I would like to say. Not sure what else to mention. Hope you 'understand' this.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/1/2007
Posts: 2,747
|
^No, I meant...
Who's received more grammys? Christina, while Britney hasn't gotten any. That's what I meant by that (sorry, didn't clairfy that well)
, but I'm not even 100% sure if Christina HAS any grammys under her belt.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/5/2007
Posts: 7,024
|
Christina got one just this year....
AND STFU YOU STUPID STANS CAN'T YOU JUST GET ALONG OR TAPE YOUR MOUTH SHUT?
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/1/2007
Posts: 2,747
|
Quote:
Originally posted by A2thaDrian
won't she flop with that stuff???
|
This was one of your first posts Adrian
It brings back memories and by the way...
Did you get your answer?
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 1/19/2006
Posts: 6,366
|
Can't believe Candyman fell off on TRL...:-/
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 5/10/2005
Posts: 12,050
|
81 AGUILERA*CHRISTINA BACK TO BASICS 8,693 -11 9,755 1,518,251
and 3.6 WW
... no comments.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 5/10/2005
Posts: 12,050
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ReBiRtH
Finally someone has the mind of a GENIUS!
I'll be honest right here and all. I like both Christina and Britney for different reasons. Even though I am much more of a fan of Britney, but I think Christina is more talented. Look at my last.fm, Britney is my second listened artist, while Christina is 27 or so.
I honestly think Britney's music is more memorable then Christinas. It's more upbeat and it's one of those types where you can listen to it and just sing along to it, and even dance too. Christina is one of those artists where we know she has much more talent, vocal wise and even grammy wise, but nothing about her music is memorable. It's good and all, but 10 years from now, are we going to remember Candyman? Probably not, we'll for sure remember Toxic though.
Britney is more of an entertainer if anything. People look up to Britney because of that. Her music is not known to be good. Being a huge Britney fan, I can even 'admit' her music isn't like...outstanding or excellent. She has the type of music that just 'gets' to you on the inside whether it's being catchy, singing along, or just simply 'hearing' her unique voice.
Christina is vocally better, yes, I'll even admit that (being a Britney fan). Christina is more talented, yes, I'll even admit that. Christina is known for her outstanding vocal power that she gives to her fans.
Christina is Christina.
Britney is Britney.
Why can't we just end this now and move along? They both went in separate paths. One went down the wrong path, while the other did fine. But now they are both on track.
Remember this though, this battle between Britney and Christina all started because of their music. Music is music, and we all have different tastes. That is all I would like to say. Not sure what else to mention. Hope you 'understand' this.
|
I LOVE U !
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 3/1/2007
Posts: 2,747
|
Thanks Xtian, I love you also <3333
|
|
|
Member Since: 5/4/2005
Posts: 21,850
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ReBiRtH
, but I'm not even 100% sure if Christina HAS any grammys under her belt.
|
Of course, for example her Grammy for the Best New Artist in 2000 which she won over Britney.
|
|
|
Banned
Member Since: 2/5/2007
Posts: 7,024
|
and favorite pop vocal for ANOM at 2007 grammies
|
|
|
|
|