[Retro]

Originally posted by RatedG²

It's from a good pollster too (the 46-44 numbers). 538's model expects a +4 Clinton win so that poll could be correct

It's been pretty widely demonstrated that their numbers are diverging now. I don't expect it to be that close.

[King Maxx]

Yeah Hillary may be short of the 2,383 needed, but she will win majority of the pledged delegates.

How could Bernie get super delegates to override that? That goes against his whole movement. She could lose over 300 of her 600+ super delegates and still win so I don't see how much success he will have with that.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Retro

It's been pretty widely demonstrated that their numbers are diverging now. I don't expect it to be that close.

I don't either. I personally think she wins +8. But Harry Enten (who is amazing btw you should follow him) said the demographic model, which is very predictive, has her +4 over Sanders in CA. So +2 is definitely possible but I think it slightly underrepresents her support

[Retro]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I don't either. I personally think she wins +8. But Harry Enten (who is amazing btw you should follow him) said the demographic model, which is very predictive, has her +4 over Sanders in CA. So +2 is definitely possible but I think it slightly underrepresents her support

I've seen it countless times, sis, and I know all about it - I shared one of his articles just today on FB - but I'm just saying I no longer think it holds entirely true since the "Clinton already won" idea is starting to take root and spread.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by King Maxx

Yeah Hillary may be short of the 2,383 needed, but she will win majority of the pledged delegates.

How could Bernie get super delegates to override that? That goes against his whole movement. She could lose over 200 super delegates and still win so I don't see how much success he will have with that.

If something with her emails happens between June 7th and the convention he could make a strong case based on polling against Trump, his strong support, and her scandals.

He has no real path short of a recommendation of indictment however. But I can easily see him having success with switching super delegates under those conditions

[Mike91]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

CNN didn't check the first reply

[vuelve88]

I imagine most super delegates think Bernie is a huge nuisance at this point. I can't really see how he intends on gaining favor when half the time he's bashing the DNC.

[@michael]

Retro, did anybody reply to your Facebook post about the Washington primary?

[D_Man3379]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

I thought Trump said he was only kidding about that?

Yeah I read he'll do it if someone donates $10 million dollars to a charity or something. Likely not gonna happen.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by D_Man3379

Yeah I read he'll do it if someone donates $10 million dollars to a charity or something. Likely not gonna happen.

I assume it is happening. Look

[LuLuDrops]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I assume it is happening. Look

"So you can both trash the Democratic nominee for 2 hours to help elect Donald Trump? No thanks."

The first comment

[Clump]

Beyoncé: Hillary Clinton Says She Has Seen Parts of Singer's 'Lemonade' and 'It's Great'


I know some people find her disingenuous, but I love her 'cool mom' persona.

[D_Man3379]

Originally posted by RatedG²

I assume it is happening. Look

Oh Bernie

Sources close to Trump said he was kidding anyway. I don't think it's gonna happen.

[Wonderland]

Originally posted by LuLuDrops

CNN didn't check the first reply

[Akil]

He'll still be screaming about that debate on November 9th, just watch.

[Mike91]

Originally posted by D_Man3379

Oh Bernie

Sources close to Trump said he was kidding anyway. I don't think it's gonna happen.

He said later on at a press conference that he would do it as long as the network that hosts it gives around $10 million of the profits made from it to charity.

And why wouldn't they? The press, coverage, ratings, etc would be worth it for any network. Not to mention, it would benefit Trump as it hurts Hillary and it would benefit Bernie/dems because someone will have the chance to attack Trump in front of a massive audience.

[retromaury]

Isn't Kentucky one of the poorest states in the country?

They just wasted tax money because Bernie wanted them to recount the votes and Hillary still came out as the winner.

Smh.

[RatedG²]

Originally posted by Mike91

He said later on at a press conference that he would do it as long as the network that hosts it gives around $10 million of the profits made from it to charity.

And why wouldn't they? The press, coverage, ratings, etc would be worth it for any network. Not to mention, it would benefit Trump as it hurts Hillary and it would benefit Bernie/dems because someone will have the chance to attack Trump in front of a massive audience.

This

IF this comes true (which I think because of Bernie's last tweet on it) then I wonder when it will be. Probably before the end of May

[Bloo]

Originally posted by retromaury

Isn't Kentucky one of the poorest states in the country?

They just wasted tax money because Bernie wanted them to recount the votes and Hillary still came out as the winner.

Smh.

We are because Eastern KY is crippled in poverty. It's really unfortunate. The rest of the state is really well off. But, Eastern KY is in awful shape.

[jgorny]

I really hope superdelegates will be rid of for the 2020 election. It's so undemocratic.